Re: [equinox-dev] equinox http service

[Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

With respect to updating org.eclipse.equinox.http.servlet to RFC 189.

Are we increasing:

* org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.compliance

* org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.source

* Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment

* org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.ui.launcher.StandardVMType

Basically, what's the baseline Java version we're limited to increasing this too.

- Ray

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello Thomas, et al.

I managed to use the org.eclipse.equinox.http.servlet without modification as the Http Service in Liferay without using the equinox bridge or doing any nasty hackery. It was actually trivially simple.

This is a good stepping stone to start hacking in the new http-service spec on top of this knowing that we're starting from an working common denominator.

Probably tomorrow I'll create a github fork with a branch for this work.

Sincerely,

- Ray

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Nvm... Old checkout.

On Mar 21, 2014 5:26 PM, "Raymond Auge" <raymond.auge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hey all,

I'd like to confirm my understanding that rt.equinox.bundles/org.eclipse.equinox.http is indeed the (and only) http-service implementation in equinox.

Thx

--

Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)

Senior Software Architect

Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)

--

Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)

Senior Software Architect

Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)

--

Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)

Senior Software Architect

Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)