[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox Subprojects

Whatever is currently in the rt.equinox.p2 repo stays with the p2 project IMO ;-)

Personally I don't see the advantage of making p2 a separate project under RT, but if the p2 leads want to do it it is fine by me.  I don't think it will give you any more freedom than you have today.

Tom



Inactive hide details for Ian Bull ---12/07/2012 12:02:08 PM---I certainly wouldn't be opposed to making p2 its own project, buIan Bull ---12/07/2012 12:02:08 PM---I certainly wouldn't be opposed to making p2 its own project, but how much extra overhead in involve

From: Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 12/07/2012 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox Subprojects
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx





I certainly wouldn't be opposed to making p2 its own project, but how much extra overhead in involved (managerial -- release, docware, etc... and technical -- builds, platform contribution, etc..)?  Also, there are a few components (simple configurator for example), which are kinda p2 and kinda platform and sorta equinox. I guess Pascal and Tom would have a good idea of where to place these things (they're in p2 right now).

cheers,
ian


On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484

http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

GIF image