> > Fragment-Host: system.bundle; extension:=extclasspath
> Would this extension:=extclasspath cause problems to other
> OSGi-Implementations like e.g. felix?
A compliant framework should reject this manifest
since the standard directive does not specify a valid value.
If you are thinking of having a non-standard, Equinox-specific
value for a standard directive, why not just add an Equinox-specific manifest
header or Equinox-specific directive?
Fragment-Host: system.bundle; x-appclasspath:=ext
This does not sound like it would work in general
anyway. What happens when the framework is launched from code whose classpath
does not include ext? I assume the option here is either use the bootclasscloader
for the parent of the classloader used to load the framework or use the
current classloader for the parent of the classloader used to load the