|Re: [equinox-dev] Git repo and the incubator|
I think you have two points:
1) One big incubator git repo for all of equinox may not be the best approach. Should we split the content out to separate git repos? If so should the git repos used for incubator code be restricted to incubator committers or can we simply merge the content into one of the other git repos.
2) We need to showcase the other things we are doing in Equinox. I'm not convinced moving around the incubator code into different git repos does anything on that front.
I'm not sure what the implications are if we move the incubator into the proper equinox work area git repositories. It seems we would have to have a blanket graduation of all the incubator committers to the individual work areas of Equinox. I do not think that is a good idea. I am also concerned about the process for adding more incubator committers. Right now we view the incubator as a low entry point for new committers and are much more flexible in nominating and voting them in. Would we still be able to hold such a vote if we don't really have an acls to control access?
Pascal Rapicault ---06/21/2011 08:23:18 AM---If I understand everything correctly, the current proposal for the structure of git repos is to have one git repo per unix user
Pascal Rapicault <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
06/21/2011 08:23 AM
[equinox-dev] Git repo and the incubator