[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Console with GoGo for Indigo

This is the kind of thing I want to address for 3.7 to enable the use of bundles on top of the framework to provide the console. Ideally this would involve a way to configure the framework so that the -console option just did what you need to get your bundles started as well as completely disabling the console support built into the framework. I think that is part of the solution proposed in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169603

Tom



Inactive hide details for "Kirchev, Lazar" ---12/02/2010 10:52:30 AM---For the extraction of the console in a separate bundle t"Kirchev, Lazar" ---12/02/2010 10:52:30 AM---For the extraction of the console in a separate bundle there is a bug opened: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169


From:

"Kirchev, Lazar" <l.kirchev@xxxxxxx>

To:

Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

12/02/2010 10:52 AM

Subject:

Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Console with GoGo for Indigo




For the extraction of the console in a separate bundle there is a bug opened:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169603
and a patch is provided there.

One of the reasons for considering the moving of the console out of the framework is that adding new features to the console while it is in the framework will increase the size of the framework. The current built-in console lacks telnet supportability features for example. Now if the console stays in the framework, it will not include such features. But such supportability features also improve usability. Probably we should provide them as an optional bundle - anyone who needs them to install this bundle? What I have prepared for the incubator is meant to run as a Gogo command, but it easily may be changed to support both cases â as a Gogo command, and the ConsoleSession interface available since 3.6.

Also, currently the only way to run Gogo on top of Equinox is to start Equinox without the âconsole option, and make Gogo bundles initially started. So it is not possible to pass âconsole and start either one, or the other. Probably add an option to specify the console jar/jars, if a console different from the built-in should be started?

Lazar



From: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Watson
Sent:
Thursday, December 02, 2010 5:50 PM
To:
Equinox development mailing list
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Console with GoGo for Indigo

We also must consider the amount of work it would take to extract the console out and test it properly. I am reluctant to do any of that work when we want to eventually replace the console implementation with the gogo shell and a bundle that bridges the old equinox command implementations to the new shell.

Tom



Inactive hide details for Jeff McAffer ---12/02/2010 09:37:45 AM---The disadvantage is usability. Right now you get equinox andJeff McAffer ---12/02/2010 09:37:45 AM---The disadvantage is usability. Right now you get equinox and run with -console and its all good. If we break it out you'll ha


From:

Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

12/02/2010 09:37 AM

Subject:

Re: [equinox-dev] Plans to replace the Console with GoGo for Indigo





The disadvantage is usability. Right now you get equinox and run with -console and its all good. If we break it out you'll have to get two bundles and make sure that the console bundle is started...


We have thought about shipping two setups, one with the console and one without. That might work but we need to consider consumer confusion (which one do I get, which one do I have, ...) and the work required to setup/maintain the build.


Perhaps the new starter kit direction we've been exploring could offer some help...


Anyway, there is a lot of pressure to improve ease of use so we need to keep that in mind through these changes.


Jeff


On 2010-12-01, at 6:02 PM, Alex Blewitt wrote:
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev


GIF image

GIF image

JPEG image

JPEG image