Re: [equinox-dev] Starting the system bundle

[Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, you should use the FrameworkEvent.STARTED event for this. You should probably open a bug so we can investigate the current behavior anyway to see if the comment is valid.

Tom



BJ Hargrave---04/14/2010 08:14:37 AM---We don't you just wait for the FrameworkEvent.STARTED event?

From:	BJ Hargrave/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
To:	Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	04/14/2010 08:14 AM
Subject:	Re: [equinox-dev] Starting the system bundle

---

We don't you just wait for the FrameworkEvent.STARTED event? 

         * This event is fired when the Framework has started after all installed 
         * bundles that are marked to be started have been started and the Framework 
         * has reached the initial start level. The source of this event is the 
         * System Bundle. 
--

BJ Hargrave Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance hargrave@xxxxxxxxxx

office: +1 386 848 1781 mobile: +1 386 848 3788

From:	"Kirchev, Lazar" <l.kirchev@xxxxxxx>
To:	"equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	2010/04/14 08:21
Subject:	[equinox-dev] Starting the system bundle
Sent by:	equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Hello, 
  
We are implementing logic which depends on the system bundle being put in ACTIVE state after all bundles, which should be running, are started. However, it turned out that actually the system bundle is put in ACTIVE state just before the bundles are started. This is evident from the method StartLevelManager.doSetStartLevel(…), which is called from the EquinoxLauncher. There is a comment in the code, that putting the bundle in ACTIVE state “should be done just before firing the STARTED event for the system bundle” but is done earlier, because “some depend on the system bundle being in the ACTIVE state when they are starting”. Do you think it is possible to change the current behavior and put the system bundle in ACTIVE state after the other bundles are started, as it is in the OSGi spec? 
  
Kind regards, 
Lazar Kirchev_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev