[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [equinox-dev] Update to Jetty and Servlet API in the M4 SDK

The version 2 bundle already existed and was part of the Ganymede Equinox SDK.

There were originally some build issues, and concerns over tighter integration with Jetty some folk were planning on doing with fragments that led us to bump the version.
In retrospect a 1.x bundle version would have been better and indeed we briefly discussed this on the equinox call but quickly concluded that the risks associated with rolling back the version of an existing released bundle would cause even more confusion.

Inactive hide details for Alex Blewitt ---12/11/2008 06:17:47 PM---So the question is ... Why are you bumping o.e.e.h.jetty froAlex Blewitt ---12/11/2008 06:17:47 PM---So the question is ... Why are you bumping o.e.e.h.jetty from 1.1->2.0 instead of 1.1->1.2?


From:

Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx>

To:

Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Cc:

Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

12/11/2008 06:17 PM

Subject:

Re: [equinox-dev] Update to Jetty and Servlet API in the M4 SDK




So the question is ... Why are you bumping o.e.e.h.jetty from 1.1->2.0 instead of 1.1->1.2?

Sent from my (new) iPhone


On 11 Dec 2008, at 20:59, Simon Kaegi <
Simon_Kaegi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
      Yes you're right.
      The bundle-version on org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty is bumped to "2.0" so to high-light Alex's point/concern...
      There is the possibility of breakage if a team used a version restricted Require-Bundle with major version semantics like:
      Require-Bundle: org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty; bundle-version="[1.1,2.0)
      The Export-Package is still using "1.1" so Import-Package users should be fine.

      As a result of this change it is important for teams that are using the server-side bundles to verify as this change could cause problems. This is why the original email was sent and is a pre-step for an entry in the 3.4 to 3.5 migration guide.
      In most cases all should be well since the actual binary API has not changed although the bundle metadata has.
      -Simon


      <graycol.gif>
      Alex Blewitt ---12/11/2008 02:50:38 PM---I thought that an API compatible change was only meant to increment
<ecblank.gif>
From:
<ecblank.gif>
Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx>
<ecblank.gif>
To:
<ecblank.gif>
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<ecblank.gif>
Cc:
<ecblank.gif>
"eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<ecblank.gif>
Date:
<ecblank.gif>
12/11/2008 02:50 PM
<ecblank.gif>
Subject:
<ecblank.gif>
Re: [equinox-dev] Update to Jetty and Servlet API in the M4 SDK




      I thought that an API compatible change was only meant to increment  
      the minor version number, rather than the major number?

      Alex

      Sent from my (new) iPhone

      On 11 Dec 2008, at 19:02, Simon Kaegi <
      Simon_Kaegi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

      > In M4 the platform team updated the version of Jetty that comes  
      > packaged with the SDK from 5.1 to 6.1.
      > This impacts the following bundles:
      >
      > 1) org.mortbay.jetty (version 5.1) (removed)
      > If your feature directly integrates with the Jetty 5 API you can  
      > continue to do so but must now add the appropriate bundles from  
      > Orbit yourself.
      >
      > 2) org.mortbay.jetty.server and org.mortbay.jetty.util (version 6.1)  
      > (added)
      >
      > 3) javax.servlet (upgraded from version 2.4 to 2.5)
      > API compatible. Bundle-Version and Export-Package version updated.  
      > Teams should verify version ranges for Import-Package and Require-
      > Bundle.
      >
      > 4) org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty (upgraded from version 1.1 to 2.0)
      > API compatible. Bundle Version updated but no change to Export-
      > Package version. Teams using Require-Bundle with a restricted bundle-
      > version range should confirm.
      >
      > --
      > None of these changes introduce new Eclipse binary API or prevent  
      > the use of existing API.
      >
      > If anyone has a problem please log a bug against RT->Equinox->Server-
      > Side
      >
      > -Simon
      > _______________________________________________
      > equinox-dev mailing list
      >
      equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
      >
      https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
      _______________________________________________
      equinox-dev mailing list

      equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
      https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev


      _______________________________________________
      equinox-dev mailing list

      equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
      https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev_______________________________________________
      equinox-dev mailing list
      equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
      https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev


GIF image

GIF image