[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Fw: [equinox-dev] Extension registry evolution


My comment was meant generically. But annotations is an example of something not supported on CDC VMs.

----- Forwarded by Mark Rogalski/Austin/IBM on 09/26/2008 01:49 PM -----
"Boris Bokowski" <bokowski@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/26/2008 01:10 PM

Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"Equinox development mailing list" <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] Extension registry evolution





On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Mark Rogalski <rogalski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Not to throw a fly in the ointment, but some of the designs being discussed
> would not work on CDC/Foundation 1.1.

Mark, what are you referring to?  Being able to use annotations in
client code, for use with dependency injection frameworks like Guice,
or were you making a more general comment?

I agree that the platform itself should continue to target CDC
Foundation 1.1, but at the same time, we should make it possible for
clients to exploit the functionality available in later VMs.

Boris
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev