Fw: [equinox-dev] Extension registry evolution

[Mark Rogalski <rogalski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

My comment was meant generically. But
annotations is an example of something not supported on CDC VMs.

----- Forwarded by Mark
Rogalski/Austin/IBM on 09/26/2008 01:49 PM -----

"Boris Bokowski" <bokowski@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/26/2008 01:10 PM

Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Equinox development mailing list" <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [equinox-dev] Extension registry evolution

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Mark Rogalski <rogalski@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> Not to throw a fly in the ointment, but some of the designs being
discussed
> would not work on CDC/Foundation 1.1.

Mark, what are you referring to?  Being able to use annotations in
client code, for use with dependency injection frameworks like Guice,
or were you making a more general comment?

I agree that the platform itself should continue to target CDC
Foundation 1.1, but at the same time, we should make it possible for
clients to exploit the functionality available in later VMs.

Boris
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev