[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re[2]: [equinox-dev] OSGi specification supported by Equnox 3.4 and OSGi test cases

Hi Tom,


Thank you for the quick reply!


I have also problem with  test.permissionadmin.conditional the fail is below. 



052106.410test.permissionadmin.conditional_TBCXtestNamedConditionalPermissionAdmin: "not allowed permission [*, class,execute,extensionLifecycle,lifecycle,listener,metadata,resolve,resource,startlevel,context] expected:[java.lang.SecurityException] but was:[org.osgi.test.cases.util.AssertionFailedError]" [result] 


..



052106.738test.permissionadmin.conditional_TBCXtestBundleSignerCondition: "not allowed permission [*, class,execute,extensionLifecycle,lifecycle,listener,metadata,resolve,resource,startlevel,context] expected:[java.lang.SecurityException] but was:[org.osgi.test.cases.util.AssertionFailedError]" [result] 


Do you have any idea about that?


-Pavlin


>

See https://www.osgi.org/members/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=564


In the R4.1 TCK these testcases assumed that exporting bundles also imported the packages from themselves. According to the spec the framework must choose a bundle to either be an exporter or an importer of a package but it cannot be both. Equinox was updated to the clarified behavior and the TCK was also updated post R4.1.


Tom




Pavlin Dobrev ---07/02/2008 04:20:41 AM---Hi all, I tried to run of the OSGi test cases for OSGi Release 4.1 (using jsr291-tck-final.zip and



From:

Pavlin Dobrev <p.dobrev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To:

"equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date:

07/02/2008 04:20 AM

Subject:

[equinox-dev] OSGi specification supported by Equnox 3.4 and OSGi test cases





Hi all,


I tried to run of the OSGi test cases for OSGi Release 4.1 (using jsr291-tck-final.zip and

osgi.ri-tck.zip) and found that some of the package admin test cases fails on

Equinox 3.4 (all of them pass on equinox 3.3.2).


The failed test cases are:

test.packageadmin.tc3

test.packageadmin.tc5


Are there any changes in the package admin mechanism between 3.3 and 3.4?

Do the Equinox 3.4 is OSGi R4.1 compatible or some part of the next

specification and/or errata is implemented?


Are there any configuration prosperities that I can use in order to

configure properly Equinox?



-Pavlin Dobrev

----------------------------------------------------- 

Dr. Pavlin Dobrev, Research and Development Manager

ProSyst Labs EOOD, 

48 Vladaiska Str., Sofia, Bulgaria, 

Tel. (+359 2) 954 91 62 . Fax. (+359 2) 953 26 17 

p.dobrev@xxxxxxxxxxx , http://www.prosyst.com 

----------------------------------------------------- 

stay in touch with your product. 

----------------------------------------------------- 


_______________________________________________

equinox-dev mailing list

equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev