[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] use of Equinox secure storage
- From: "Alex Blewitt" <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 23:32:11 +0100
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JrrvE9kk8G07LcTWI8A9nwjG0qMtqdKoiYnhuezUi6oShjiUyUT+lJf4jvnlM3iuTKikmigmtGEbs62BGzqs2eCD+U7LOmjne0eU08deVDhf7Pm3uJ9gKLxbbkWPF4WnyIPr8DsTRSIm9PU1DdhRYDeEnlBOwsCzp7PBcA0ON4k=
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Agreed RE: making life easier WRT authentication/account mgmt/single
> sign-on, etc. I'm hoping that Matt, Eric, Thomas, etc. will also work with
> us to take further advantage after 3.4 is out.
Did you ever have any luck with Kerberos? I had an implementation of
kerberized CVS (which has missed most of the 3.x releases by now,
including this one) which acquired kerberos credentials using Sun's
kerberos manager. A colleague at work developed this idea a bit
Would I be able to provide any assistance in the kerberos domain, or
is kerberized ECF services not something you've come across?