[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Thoughts on the engine

I'm sorry but I don't understand what you are trying to achieve, nor what
the problem is.

The SDK IU is an artificial root that we create at metadata generation time
to provide one entity to install and get the sdk. The presence of this IU
does not prevent you to define "James SDK" IU. You should be able to
compose and/or install directly from the other IUs since they are
completely independent.
For example if you were to install the "org.eclipse.core.runtime" IU you
would get it and all its prereq, thing that we were not able to do before.


PaScaL


                                                                           
             James D Miles                                                 
             <jdmiles@xxxxxxxx                                             
             om>                                                        To 
             Sent by:                  Equinox development mailing list    
             equinox-dev-bounc         <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>           
             es@xxxxxxxxxxx                                             cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
             08/16/2007 05:16          Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Thoughts   
             PM                        on the engine                       
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
                  Equinox                                                  
                development                                                
               mailing list                                                
             <equinox-dev@ecli                                             
                 pse.org>                                                  
                                                                           
                                                                           




      Do you mean that some operations must be done with the actual user
      being
      identified?
      Yes, if you are sharing an install (multiuser), each user must be
      configured separately. And to your point in <tangent 2> each user may
      be managed differently.

      <cotangent 2>
      My thoughts were along these lines. Currently we have an IU with id
      "sdk" in the sample. This sample provides no capabilities but only
      list requirements to be installed. While it should remain an IU it
      should be categorized by subclassing or creating an interface for all
      of these: IU fragment, IU, etc. That would allow another abstraction
      that manages a description ("sdk") of what can be installed. These
      could me managed on a per user basis if that is what is wanted.
      </cotangent>


(Embedded image moved to file: pic08335.gif)Inactive hide details for "Tim
Webb" <tim@xxxxxxxxxx>"Tim Webb" <tim@xxxxxxxxxx>

                                                                           
                         "Tim Webb"                                        
                         <tim@xxxxxxxx                                     
                         om>                                               
                         Sent by:      (Embedded image moved to file:      
                         equinox-dev-b pic03420.gif)                       
                         ounces@eclips                                  To 
                         e.org                     (Embedded image moved   
                                                   to file: pic31381.gif)  
                                                   "Equinox development    
                         08/16/2007                mailing list"           
                         03:40 PM                  <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxx 
                                                   g>                      
                                       (Embedded image moved to file:      
           Please respond to           pic15965.gif)                       
   Equinox development mailing list                                     cc 
       <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>                   (Embedded image moved   
                                                   to file: pic13816.gif)  
                                       (Embedded image moved to file:      
                                       pic31066.gif)                       
                                                                   Subject 
                                                   (Embedded image moved   
                                                   to file: pic15739.gif)  
                                                   Re: [equinox-dev]       
                                                   [prov] Thoughts on the  
                                                   engine                  
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                       (Embedded image moved to file:      
                                       pic26985.gif)                       
                                              (Embedded image moved to     
                                              file: pic08985.gif)          
                                                                           
                                                                           


      <tangent>
      That said I must admit that I'm not super happy with this solution
      since to
      make such a "fetch only" operation usable, either the director would
      have
      to expose a "fetch" operation (but it would also have to expose a
      "install"
      operation to solve the other pb mentioned by James), or one would
      have to
      either author its own director (or at least extend the current one)
      which
      is something we want to avoid. In the light of recent discussions
      with Tim
      and others, I wonder if the director should not become just a planner
      that
      returns a bunch on operations that needs to be performed. The results
      of
      this planner would then be passed on to the engine and a "target"
      phase
      could be specified. For example:
      EngineOperation[] op = director.install(ius, profile1)
      engine(op, "fetch"); //This means do the operations but stop at
      fetch.
      </tangent>

This actually makes a lot of sense to me. It addresses multiple concerns
including being able to present to the user an accurate statement of how
much work needs to be performed, as well as allowing for much easier re-use
in server-side scenarios.
      Do you mean that some operations must be done with the actual user
      being
      identified?

<tangent id="2">
While probably not where you were going with this one, mentioning per-user
operations reminded me of another flow we were planning to support in Maya
where some software would only be available to certain users. If we were
using user-aware repositories as part of the resolution process, would we
do the filtering inside the repository? If so, how would we handle this in
a multi-user scenario especially when a director/planner is being used
server-side? Ideally I'd like the flexibility of filtering which software
is available to which user, but currently the implementation / APIs do not
allow passing of any handle or request-identifier to the repositories to
aide in determining which software is available. Thoughts?
</tangent>_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
(See attached file: pic00393.gif)
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

Attachment: pic08335.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: pic03420.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: pic31381.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: pic15965.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: pic13816.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: pic31066.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: pic15739.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: pic26985.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: pic08985.gif
Description: GIF image

Attachment: pic00393.gif
Description: GIF image