[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[equinox-dev] [prov] [provisioning-dev] two process questions...


thanks.  forwarding to equinox-dev...
----- Forwarded by Susan M Franklin/Beaverton/IBM on 07/27/2007 07:54 AM -----
Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: provisioning-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/26/2007 08:12 PM
Please respond to "Developer discussions for provisioning \(Update Manager\)        initiatives"

       
        To:        "Developer discussions for provisioning \(Update Manager\) initiatives" <provisioning-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc:        
        Subject:        Re: [provisioning-dev] two  process questions...




1) yes, I think we in Equinox should use 3.4M1 as our M1 target.  We are a week earlier than the full project but that's ok.


2) The provisioning-dev list was setup mostly for general provisioning discussions across Eclipse (e.g., Equionx, Maya, EPP, ...).  Notifications of progress, conceptual discussions, usecases, ...  Maya and Equinox have (currently) separate code bases and developer communities.  So for example, the discussion around M1 is only relevant to Equinox (unless Maya happens to be having an M1 at the same time).  I do think that people should be subscribed to this list but it would likely be best to keep the Equinox and Maya detailed discussions on their respective lists.  Note, I am not dogmatic about this and could be argued into a different position.


Jeff




Susan M Franklin <susan_franklin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: provisioning-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/26/2007 06:38 PM

Please respond to
"Developer discussions for provisioning \(Update Manager\)        initiatives" <provisioning-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
provisioning-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[provisioning-dev] two  process questions...








1 - Should we start using bugzilla milestones (such as 3.4 M1) to tag provisioning bugs that we fix for our M1?...or is this confusing for those running reports on the 3.4 release since the code is not mainstream 3.4 yet?  

2 - I've noticed that most provisioning questions/discussions lately have taken place on equinox-dev with [prov] in the title.  Is this just to reach a wider audience and should we be encouraging people to subscribe to this mailing list?  

thanks,

susan
_______________________________________________
provisioning-dev mailing list
provisioning-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/provisioning-dev

_______________________________________________
provisioning-dev mailing list
provisioning-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/provisioning-dev