[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: Re[4]: [equinox-dev] Prosyst contributions

Well, why not call it 'o.e.provisioning' then? What's so initial about it?

On 08/07/07, BJ Hargrave <hargrave@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
o.e.eq.ip should only be an internal (private) package name. The public
API is defined by OSGi: org.osgi.service.provisioning.
--

BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
hargrave@xxxxxxxxxx

office: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788




"Alex Blewitt" <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx> Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-08 07:21 Please respond to Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>


To "Pavlin Dobrev" <p.dobrev@xxxxxxxxxxx> cc Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject Re: Re[4]: [equinox-dev] Prosyst contributions






It would be better to have a more descriptive bundle symbollic name, that's for sure. The question then becomes whether it makes sense to keep the bundle symbolic name and package name in sync. Given that most package imports are handled automatically by Eclipse anyway, the only reason I can think for having a shorter package name is that it takes up a few less chars in the various UTF-8 constant pools in the .class files; but if that were really an issue, we'd be calling the packages o.e.eq.ip anyway.

The danger with using 'ip' as the package name is that it effectively
prevents anyone from having a package with the same name for unrelated
services; for example, an OSGi bundle for generating ICMP IP packets.

I'd vote for a longer name in both cases. Not that my vote counts for
anything, but as a periodic lurker on the mailing list ...

Alex.

On 08/07/07, Pavlin Dobrev <p.dobrev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> My personal opinion also is that IP is a horible name but maybe as BJ
> propose we can use long bundle symbolic name?
>
> -Pavlin
>
> AB> I'm glad I'm not alone. I've asked the question to a wider audience
to
> AB> see if they'd get the reference:
>
> AB> http://www.eclipsezone.com/eclipse/forums/t98469.html
>
> AB> On 07/07/07, Remy Chi Jian Suen <remy.suen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> You're not alone, Alex. I think ip is a horrible name.
> >> initprovisioning or initprov or something would've been better.
> >> There's just no way that someone's going to know that 'ip' is
'initial
> >> provisioning'.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Rem
> >>
> >> On 7/7/07, Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Am I really the only one who thinks '.ip'  is a bad name?
> >> >
> >> > Alex.
> >> >
> >> > On 07/07/07, Simon Kaegi <Simon_Kaegi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > > That's great! I've just done a quick sanity check and everything
compiles,
> >> > > starts and is ready to try out.
> >> > >  Thanks.
> >> > >
> >> > > For anyone wanting to take a look, the following new projects
were added to
> >> > > the incubator.
> >> > >
> >> > > 1) org.eclipse.equinox.ds
> >> > > 2) org.eclipse.equinox.io
> >> > > 3) org.eclipse.equinox.ip
> >> > > 4) org.eclipse.equinox.util
> >> > > 5) org.eclipse.equinox.wireadmin
> >> > >
> >> > > I had one cosmetic question for equinox.util. Currently the BSN
is
> >> > > "org.eclipse.equinox.util.putifull" -- is there some reason it's
not just
> >> > > org.eclipse.equinox.util?
> >> > > -Simon
> >> > >
> >> > > equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 07/07/2007 06:41:23 AM:
> >> > >
> >> > > > In CVS under your proposed naming.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -Pavlin
> >> > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > OK, I'm not particular about the names right now.  Since we
already
> >> > > > have a DS bundle lets just use org.eclipse.equinox.ds for
> >> > > > declarative services.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I also like org.eclipse.equinox.ip for initial provisioning but
> >> > > > thought it might be to short :)  but it is snappy.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Pavlin, if these are ok with you please release with the names
org.
> >> > > > eclipse.equinox.ds and org.eclipse.equinox.ip.  As I said
before it
> >> > > > is no big deal to rename the bundles if needed in the incubator
later.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Tom
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Chris Aniszczyk/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
> >> > > > Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > > 07/05/2007 09:34 PM
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Please respond to
> >> > > > Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > To
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > cc
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Subject
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Re: [equinox-dev] Prosyst contributions
> >> > > >
> >> > > > as an outsider, +1 for DS instead of SCR, there's like 5 people
that
> >> > > > would get the SCR reference :)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > initialprovisioning is really long....
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Cheers,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > > Chris Aniszczyk | IBM Lotus | Eclipse Committer |
http://mea-bloga.
> >> > > > blogspot.com | +1.860.839.2465
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed] Jeff McAffer ---07/05/2007 09:13:02 PM---I
agree
> >> > > > with all/most Tom said. In the end we should look to have just
one
> >> > > > DS implementation, Ultimately I suggest that it be
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > > From:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > > Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > > To:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > > Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > > Date:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > > 07/05/2007 09:13 PM
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > > Subject:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > > Re: [equinox-dev] Prosyst contributions
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I agree with all/most Tom said. In the end we should look to
have
> >> > > > just one DS implementation, Ultimately I suggest that it be
called
> >> > > > o.e.e.ds. Never did like "scr". I'm a little bummed by o.e.e.
> >> > > > initialprovisioning. o.e.e.ip is snappier and I doubt that
anyone
> >> > > > would get confused with Intelectual property, or Internet
Protocol
> >> > > > or, ... In any event, it is a mild dislike so...
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Lets get the code in the incubator and move forward.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Jeff
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > > Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > > 07/05/2007 03:51 PM
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Please respond to
> >> > > > Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > To
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > cc
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Subject
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Re: [equinox-dev] Prosyst contributions
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image removed]
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi Simon,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I can commit the sources in the CVS. Here are the open issues
> >> > > > > that should be resolved prior moving code to the CVS.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 1. Naming.
> >> > > > > Following the discussion the last proposed naming is:
> >> > > > > 1.1 org.eclipse.equionx.initialprovisioning
> >> > > > > other suggestion: org.eclipse.equionx.ip
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +1 for org.eclipse.equinox.initialprovisioning
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I think this name will reduce an confusion with the
> >> > > > rest of the equinox provisioning work.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > 1.2 org.eclipse.equionx.ds
> >> > > > > other suggestion: org.eclipse.equionx.scr
> >> > > >
> >> > > > +1 for org.eclipse.equinox.scr
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > 1.3 org.eclipse.equinox.io
> >> > > > > 1.4 org.eclipse.equinox.util
> >> > > > > 1.5 org.eclipse.equinox.wireadmin
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 2. Replacing. If we use the names
org.eclipse.equinox.wireadmin and
> >> > > > > org.eclipse.equionx.ds they collide with the current one. Can
we
> >> > > replace
> >> > > > > the code in the CVS at this stage directly or temporary other
names
> >> > > > > will be used?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > There is no problem replacing the current implementations in
the
> >> > > > incubator.  To be clear this is under the equinox-incubator
directory
> >> > > > at dev.eclipse.org:/cvsroot/eclipse.  At this point I suggest
we
> >> > > > get the initial code released in the incubator.  It is likely
that
> >> > > > a number of refactorings are going be needed to follow other
> >> > > > eclipse coding practices (i.e. using "internal" package names
etc.).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'm not fussed on getting all the names correct initially.  We
> >> > > > can easily rename them if needed in the incubator.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 3. javax.microedition.io package
> >> > > > > Now it is in Connector services implementation. This is not a
good
> >> > > > > choice because it is needed only on Java SE VMs. J2ME VMs
> >> > > > > contains that package. In our equinox distribution it is a
fragment of
> >> > > > > the system bundle that is installed only on Java SE VMs.
> >> > > > > But initially we can put it inside the connector
implementation.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > -Pavlin
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I think we should consider separating this out into another
bundle and
> >> > > > import the packages from org.eclipse.equinox.io (but we can do
this
> >> > > later).
> >> > > > I'm not sure why it has to be a system bundle fragment.  I
think we
> >> > > should
> >> > > > make it a normal bundle (called javax.microedition.io?).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Tom _______________________________________________
> >> > > > equinox-dev mailing list
> >> > > > equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > equinox-dev mailing list
> >> > > > equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > equinox-dev mailing list
> >> > > > equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
> >> > > >
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > equinox-dev mailing list
> >> > > > equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
> >> > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > equinox-dev mailing list
> >> > > equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
> >> > >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > equinox-dev mailing list
> >> > equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> equinox-dev mailing list
> >> equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
> >>
> AB> _______________________________________________
> AB> equinox-dev mailing list
> AB> equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> AB> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev


_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev