[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [equinox-dev] VOTE new Equinox services from ProSyst
- From: DJ Houghton <DJ_Houghton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:58:31 -0400
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 04/04/2007 01:37:11 PM:
> This is great. As per the process message I just sent, we should
> poll the community for interest in accepting these contributions.
> To be clear to the community, the expectation is that Prosyst will
> be following through here with ongoing service and support for these
> implementations. The contributions will first go into the Incubator
> while they are reviewed and massaged. They will then graduate as
> appropriate into the Bundles component.
> Please cast your votes on this list.
> Dimitar Valtchev <d.valtchev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 04/03/2007 09:26 AM
> Please respond to
> Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> [equinox-dev] new Equinox services from ProSyst
> We are now ready with the source code of our OSGi services which we
> will contribute to Equinox. These are:
> - Implementation of OSGi Declarative Services Specification
> - Implementation of OSGi IO Connector Service Specification
> - Implementation of OSGi Initial Provisioning
> - Implementation of OSGi Wire Admin Service Specification
> We have done the following:
> -all class packages have now names in the Eclipse namespace;
> -all common utility classes used in the implementation of the services
> above are packed in a separated bundle (util.jar) which is also
> available under EPL and uses the Eclipse namespace;
> -there are no dependencies on any other ProSyst classes.
> My understanding is that we are currently not able to put any code
> directly into the incubator area. Our case should be covered by Fig.6
> of the document at
> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/EclipseLegalProcessPoster.pdf, which
> means that we need to fill the Contribution Questionnaire on Committer
> Tools, to which we do not have access because we do not have a
> committer status yet.
> Jeff could you help us on this issue (I have already asked for a
> committer status for our developers Pavlin Dobrev and Teodor Todorov)?
> I can also provide a public link for FTP download and you can then put
> the source into the Equinox CVS but I assume that this does not comply
> with the defined legal process. How should we proceed?