> Thomas Watson wrote:
> > Hi
> > You have a point here. There is already a bug opened
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146633.
> > Comments from Oleg indicate that this still does not work in
> > Seems like a simple Class.forName check could be done to pick
> > correct strategy if jobs is not available.
> OK. I think that bugzilla is the place to continue this discussion.
Yep, any comments or assistence you can provide should
be added to that bug report. Thanks.
> > The Equinox OSGi Framework implementation (org.eclipse.osgi)
> > this package. The framework itself makes no references
to the jobs
> > package.
> > PlatformAdmin can be used without any bundles installed in Equinox.
> Yes, you are right. I pointed out this because the org.eclipse.osgi
> bundle wasn't in the listed bundles which DJ recommended to use when
> try to run the registry bundle on other framework. If this is
> intentional, then registry bundle must be made optional dependent
> PlatformAdmin. Does running registry bundle on another framework have
> been tried?
In 3.3 the package imports have been made optional from the registry. See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146824
for details. You are correct, this is not the case in 3.2.x.