Re: [equinox-dev] Incubator commit rights for Kim Horne

[Kimberly Horne <kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am now doubting myself.  I really like the feel of this solution.   
Augmenting the builder to process bundle resources seems so much more  
elegant than inserting transformation points at N levels of the  
runtime.  Other than the loss of transformations based on runtime  
state (a dubious asset at best) the main drawback I can see is how it  
would affect the shell sharing scenario.  If multiple logical  
products use the same bundles it'd be impossible to have product- 
level customizations.

On Oct 25, 2006, at 4:28 PM, BJ Hargrave wrote:

> Also, does the transformation need to be done at runtime? It seems  
> the use
> cases are all packaging issues in assembling an RCP based product.  
> Why not
> just have support for transformation at packaging time instead of  
> runtime.
> This will then remove the runtime variability which can cause
> stability/debugging issues.