[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [equinox-dev] Bug in "Run As Equinox"
|
Hi,
A simple test could be:
1. Add eclipse 3.2.1 plugins folder as target platform
2. Add org.ops4j.pax.logging.api
http://repository.ops4j.org/maven2/org/ops4j/pax/logging/api/0.9.4/api-0.9.4.jar to the plugins folder.
3. Set up a run as eclipse application, and set the program to run:
org.eclipse.platform.ide
4. In plugins tab folder include
org.ops4j.pax.logging.api
5. In arguments tab, in program argument add
-console 5000
5. Click Apply
6. Click Run
Once the application started.
7. Telnet
127.0.0.1
5000
8. Execute
osgi> sl
Framework Active Start Level = 6
9. Execute
osgi> sl 58
Bundle 58 Start Level = 4
Note: Bundle 58 = org.ops4j.pax.logging.api_0.9.4
10. To prove that logging api can be started. Execute
osgi> start 58
osgi> bundle 58
update@plugins/org.ops4.pax.logging.api-0.9.4.jar [58]
Id=58, Status=ACTIVE Data Root=C:\Documents and Settings\efy\Desktop\radman\org.eclipse.osgi\bundles\58\data
No registered services.
No services in use.
Exported packages
org.ops4j.pax.logging; version="0.9.4"[exported]
org.knopflerfish.service.log; version="1.1.0"[exported]
Imported packages
org.osgi.framework; version="1.3.0"<System Bundle [0]>
org.osgi.util.tracker; version="1.3.2"<System Bundle [0]>
org.osgi.service.log; version="1.3.0"<update@plugins
/org.eclipse.osgi.services_3.1.100.v20060601.jar [35]>
org.ops4j.pax.logging; version="0.9.4"<update@plugins/org.ops4.pax.logging.api-0.9.4.jar [58]>
org.knopflerfish.service.log; version="
1.1.0"<update@plugins/org.ops4.pax.logging.api-0.9.4.jar [58]>
No fragment bundles
Named class space
org.ops4j.pax.logging.api; bundle-version="0.9.4"[provided]
No required bundles
Regards,
Edward Yakop
On 10/12/06, Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK, open a bug against Equinox->Framework.
Preliminary tests with my own bundles do not seem to reproduce the
problem. Please detail the steps to reproduce in the bug report.
Thanks.
Tom
Some preliminary checks;
26 ACTIVE org.eclipse.ui.workbench_3.3.0.I20060921-0010
27 RESOLVED org.eclipse.ui.workbench.texteditor_3.3.0.v20060920-1200
28 RESOLVED org.ops4j.pax.logging.api_0.9.4
29 RESOLVED org.ops4j.pax.logging.log4j_0.9.4
30 RESOLVED org.ops4j.pax.logging.service_0.9.4
31 ACTIVE org.ops4j.pax.radman.client_1.0.0
32 RESOLVED org.ops4j.pax.radman.client.api_1.0.0
33 RESOLVED org.ops4j.pax.radman.client.cache_1.0.0
34 RESOLVED org.ops4j.pax.radman.client.cache.ui_1.0.0
35 RESOLVED org.ops4j.pax.radman.client.console_1.0.0
osgi> sl
Framework Active Start Level = 6
osgi> sl 28
Bundle 28 Start Level = 4
Bundle 28 has no Imports and no BundleActivator. No exceptions
or other errors are output.
To me this looks more like a Equinox bug than a PDE bug...
Cheers
Niclas
On 10/12/06, Niclas Hedhman <
niclas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/11/06, Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx
>
wrote:
That syntax should be fine. It tells the bootstrap code (in EclipseStarter)
to mark the bundle for persistent start and set its start-level to the
value specified by the property osgi.bundles.defaultStartLevel
So we thought...
At the console run the "sl"
command to see what start-level the framework is set to and then run the
"sl <bundle id>" command to see what start level your bundle
is set to. It seems like your bundles have a start-level that is
higher than the current start-level of the framework. There are two
properties you should pay attention to.
osgi.bundles.defaultStartLevel - used to set the start-level of installed
bundles that do not specify a particular start-level in the osgi.bundles
list (defaults to 4).
osgi.startLevel - used to set the initial start-level of the framework
(defaults to 6).
Yes, of course, we will double, double check that... I just got a queesy
feeling that bundle default startlevel and framework startlevel was mixed
up...
If you set osgi.bundles.defaultStartLevel
> osgi.startLevel then your bundles will not be able to start because
they will have a higher start-level than the current Framework start-level.
If this is not what is going on then please open a bug against PDE-UI.
Ok, thanks for the feedback...
Cheers
Niclas
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev