Re: [equinox-dev] Status of Equinox respect to OSGi R4

["Richard S. Hall" <heavy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff McAffer wrote:
> Equinox is the R4 reference implementation so yes, it is compliant

Isn't it possible that such an answer could be misconstrued? Equinox 
does not implement every aspect of the R4 specification. Granted, 
Equinox implements a very large portion of it, but it seems more 
forthright to be clear about what it means to be "fully" compliant, 
which is what was asked.

-> richard

> Jeff
>
>
>
> *"Piero Campanelli" <pierocampanelli@xxxxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 10/06/2006 04:19 PM
> Please respond to
> pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Please respond to
> Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> 	
> To
> 	equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	[equinox-dev] Status of Equinox respect to OSGi R4
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> What's the status of Equinox respect to R4 spec? Is equinox 
> fully-compliant? According this page not yet.._
> __http://www.eclipse.org/equinox/bundles/_
>
> right?
>
> _______________________________________________
> equinox-dev mailing list
> equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> equinox-dev mailing list
> equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>