Re: [equinox-dev] Location of Persistent UserAdmin Data

[Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Pascal,

Can you clarify why Eclispe update can
not make these types of decisions?  Take the following example:

1)  A new feature is installed
into Eclipse
2)  As a result update decides
to uninstall bundle X version 1.0.0 and install bundle X version 2.0.0.

In this case Eclipse update decided
it was ok to uninstall bundle X 1.0.0 and install a new bundle X version
2.0.0.  Why could it not have just updated bundle X version 1.0.0
to bundle X version 2.0.0 (instead of uninstall/install process)?  It
had enough information to decide to uninstall bundle X version 1.0.0 so
why not just update it to version 2.0.0?  I do not see the issue here.

Tom.

Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/04/2006 04:09 AM

Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [equinox-dev] Location of Persistent UserAdmin Data

Eclipse update is not in a position of deciding with full satisfaction
of the user whether things should be "updated", "installed",
"uninstalled then installed". For example, if one had junit 3.8
and wanted to install junit 4.0... what should happen? For that it needs
to 

If OSGi was not alwasys tightening up its lose ends with the magic "management
agent" :-) 

PaScaL

Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/01/2006 02:28 PM

Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list

To	Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [equinox-dev] Location of Persistent UserAdmin Data

See bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=73013 against Eclipse->Platform->Update.

If eclipse update would use the proper Bundle.update method instead of
uninstalling/installing each time a new version of a bundle bacame available
then these types of issues would be solved. 

Tom

Roy Paterson/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/01/2006 01:04 PM

Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [equinox-dev] Location of Persistent UserAdmin Data

BJ's answer is correct from an OSGi spec standpoint, but there are Eclipse
considerations which are relavant to Benjamin's questions.  See
http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=124176#c10.

In summary bundle ids do not change between framework launches, but if
you
update a bundle using Eclipse update it actually uninstalls the old version
and installs the new version, resulting in a new bundle id.  This
was an
issue with the OSGi Prefs implementation.  In the end we just documented
it
as a known limitation.

Regards,
Roy

-----------------------------------------
Roy Paterson
IBM Pervasive Computing
Austin, TX
Phone: (512) 838-8898



                    
                     
                     
        
           BJ          
                     
                     
     
           Hargrave/Austin/I      
                     
                
           BM@IBMUS        
                     
                    To
           Sent by:        
         Equinox development mailing list  
 
           equinox-dev-bounc      
  <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>          
           es@xxxxxxxxxxx      
                     
                cc 
                    
                     
                     
        
                    
                     
                     
Subject 
           06/01/2006 12:20      
   Re: [equinox-dev] Location of       
           PM          
             Persistent UserAdmin Data
          
                    
                     
                     
        
                    
                     
                     
        
           Please respond to      
                     
                
                Equinox  
                     
                     
   
              development    
                     
                     
             mailing list      
                     
                   
           <equinox-dev@ecli    
                     
                  
               pse.org>    
                     
                     
 
                    
                     
                     
        
                    
                     
                     
        




Bundle ids cannot change between framework launches. The bundle id is the
primary key of the bundle and may not change or ever be reused within a
framework instance.

BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
hargrave@xxxxxxxxxx
Office: +1 407 849 9117 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788



"Benjamin Schmaus" <benjamin.schmaus@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
2006-06-01 12:46 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>


To
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
[equinox-dev] Location of Persistent UserAdmin Data






Equinox Developers,

I've been developing a user/group admin bundle that runs on top of the
Equinox OSGi UserAdmin service  implementation, and I've noticed that
data
is persisted to a file that is named like so:

"org.eclipse.core.runtime.preferences.OSGiPreferences." +
bundle.getBundleId()

So the actual file name might end up being something like:
"org.eclipse.core.runtime.preferences.OSGiPreferences.27.prefs"

Since a bundle's id can change between framework starts and stops, users
and roles created by a given bundle during one execution of the framework
won't necessarily be available to that bundle in another execution of the
framework ( i.e. since bundle id can vary across runs).

Should a bundle have to re-create user and role assignments on every start
of the framework if persistent data can't be located?  That doesn't
seem
right to me.

It could be that user admin data can be persisted to a static (known
before runtime) location via the Equinox UserAdmin impl, but it's not
clear to me how this should be done.

- Ben Schmaus_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev


_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev


_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev