[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re[4]: [equinox-dev] About the benchmarks of OSGi
|
Isnt benchmarking wonderful! :-)
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
JM> Yes but the resolver etc is more complicated and takes more
JM> work. �What you are calling esoteric may well be main line for
JM> Eclipse (and vice versa). �Pascal'point is very apt. �If you are
JM> measuring startup and footprint the R4 changes likely play a role.
JM> �In any event, implementations should stand on their
JM> merits/behaviour. �The scale factor should not be underestimated
JM> also. �Eclipse has been optimized to run 1000s (yes, 3 zeros) of
JM> bundles. �Our footprint might be larger to start but in larger
JM> systems we are smaller and faster.
JM> Jeff
JM> Peter Kriens <Peter.Kriens@xxxxxxxx>
JM> Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
JM> 04/13/2005 10:09 AM
JM> Please respond to
JM> pkriens and Equinox development mailing list
JM> To
JM> Pascal Rapicault/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCAcc
JM> Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>Subject
JM> Re[2]: [equinox-dev] About the benchmarks of OSGi
JM> R3 are still compatible with R4. R4 added some new
JM> class loading features but they are mostly in the more esoteric range
JM> for large deployments that do not want to refactor their code.
JM> R3 bundles are still more or less the preferred mode and run unchanged
JM> on R4 frameworks.
JM> Kind regards,
JM> � � Peter kriens
PR>> First you would have to compare OSGi implementations that are
PR>> functionnaly equivalents. For example eclipse' osgi implements
PR>> R4.0 behavior which is a lot different than the R3.0.
PR>> Then depending on which aspects you want to measure you would
PR>> probably have to instrument the code base in order to get
PR>> comparable numbers.
PR>> Some numbers that could be interesting:
PR>> ????- memory consumption of a bundle
PR>> ????- time to load a class
PR>> ????- startup time
PR>> ????- how many bundles can the system handle
PR>> ????- service lookup time
PR>> PaScaL
PR>> "rvm2004" <rvm2004@xxxxxxx>
PR>> Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
PR>> 04/12/2005 11:19 PM
PR>> Please respond to
PR>> �Equinox development mailing list
PR>> To
PR>> equinox-dev@eclipse.orgcc
PR>> Subject
PR>> [equinox-dev] About the benchmarks of OSGi
PR>> Hi all
PR>> �I am very interested in the Eclipse and OSGi technology. Now
PR>> I am doing the research about OSGi, and I want to know whether
PR>> there are some key points or benchmarks that can measure the
PR>> performance of the OSGi platform(such as Eclipse OSGi,SMF etc.)
PR>> ,for example the usage of virtual memory, physics memory, basic
PR>> startup time, and so on. That is if I want to compare several OSGi
PR>> platform’s performance, and optimize one of them, which aspects
PR>> should I consider? Which aspects could demonstrate the performance
PR>> of a OSGi platform?And if I want to do some optimization for OSGi
PR>> platform,which aspects can I optimize?what is the Future
PR>> directions?Any response will be appreciated, thanks very much.
PR>> �Best wishes, Zhoujing
PR>> ?网易188财富邮--财富的象征；全新开放, 丰富用户名等您注册
PR>> ��最�?G空间，附件40兆收发；免费注册体验
PR>> http://www.188.com/_______________________________________________
PR>> �equinox-dev mailing list
PR>> �equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
PR>> �https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
JM> �
JM> --
JM> Peter Kriens � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �Mob +33633746480
JM> 9C, Avenue St. Dr�z�ry � � � � � � � � � �Tel +33467542167
JM> 34160 Beaulieu, France � � � � � � � � � �Tel +15123514821
JM> AOL,Yahoo pkriens � � � � � � � � � � � � ICQ 255570717
JM> _______________________________________________
JM> equinox-dev mailing list
JM> equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
JM> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
--
Peter Kriens Mob +33633746480
9C, Avenue St. Dr�z�ry Tel +33467542167
34160 Beaulieu, France Tel +15123514821
AOL,Yahoo pkriens ICQ 255570717
