[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [equinox-dev] Question about RFP44
- From: Peter Kriens <Peter.Kriens@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 17:36:45 +0200
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Organization: aQute
RFP 44 is a document requesting new functionality, it should not
mention design choices yet. Some of the issues were discussed on the
CPEG meeting yesterday in Munchen, especially the Set return type.
When the RFP is accepted (it looks like it will be because there is no
resistance) then we will write the RFC that lays out the actual
design. The fact that we are considering scopes and fragments
significantly changes our view of the world from a simple jar file to
a collection of jar files. Obviously it will take some effort to
oversee all the implications.
The points you raise are valid and should be captured in the RFC
discussion, can we copy these?
Thanks, kind regards,
PR> I have a question relative to the RFP 44 and the enumeration of resources.
PR> Please see: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=41229
Peter Kriens Mob. +46705950899