Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [epp-dev] EPP 2021-03 RC1


> On 5 Mar 2021, at 12:21, Frederic Gurr <frederic.gurr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I'm getting between 3-6MB/s on my side of the
> internet.

Then it must be a peering problem; pings are fine, I can reach the UK in about 50 ms and the US in about 120-130 ms, which should not be a problem in itself:


ilg@wks ~ % ping download.eclipse.org
PING download.eclipse.org (198.41.30.199): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=143.643 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=146.678 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=148.216 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=128.717 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=140.205 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=137.109 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=137.114 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=137.958 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=8 ttl=52 time=137.174 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=9 ttl=52 time=128.841 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=10 ttl=52 time=129.946 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=11 ttl=52 time=131.012 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=12 ttl=52 time=131.011 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=13 ttl=52 time=129.577 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=14 ttl=52 time=130.938 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=15 ttl=52 time=129.611 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=16 ttl=52 time=129.968 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=17 ttl=52 time=133.409 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=18 ttl=52 time=130.106 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=19 ttl=52 time=130.622 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=20 ttl=52 time=129.337 ms
64 bytes from 198.41.30.199: icmp_seq=21 ttl=52 time=128.977 ms
^C
--- download.eclipse.org ping statistics ---
22 packets transmitted, 22 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 128.717/134.099/148.216/5.902 ms
ilg@wks ~ % 


ilg@wks ~ % traceroute download.eclipse.org
traceroute to download.eclipse.org (198.41.30.199), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
 1  172.16.62.1 (172.16.62.1)  0.990 ms  0.631 ms  0.647 ms
 2  stamacasa.rdsnet.ro (10.0.0.1)  8.740 ms  2.278 ms  28.980 ms
 3  totulvafibine.rdsnet.ro (172.19.211.129)  6.204 ms  27.739 ms  24.135 ms
 4  10.220.177.253 (10.220.177.253)  47.765 ms
    xr01.londra.rdsnet.ro (10.220.128.77)  44.427 ms
    10.220.177.253 (10.220.177.253)  50.251 ms
 5  ae15.mpr1.lhr15.uk.above.net (195.66.224.76)  44.372 ms  48.969 ms  47.305 ms
 6  * * *
 7  ae5.cs3.lga5.us.eth.zayo.com (64.125.29.126)  120.445 ms * *
 8  ae21.mpr2.tor1.ca.us.zip.zayo.com (64.125.26.139)  119.308 ms  118.485 ms  120.301 ms
 9  zayo-allstream.mpr2.tor1.ca.zip.zayo.com (64.125.14.231)  119.184 ms  119.987 ms  118.084 ms
10  199.212.161.126 (199.212.161.126)  128.425 ms  127.281 ms  138.928 ms
11  216.191.235.18 (216.191.235.18)  127.431 ms  127.854 ms  129.553 ms
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *


ilg@wks ~ % traceroute www.eclipse.org
traceroute to eclipse.org (198.41.30.198), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
 1  172.16.62.1 (172.16.62.1)  0.783 ms  0.573 ms  0.521 ms
 2  stamacasa.rdsnet.ro (10.0.0.1)  2.444 ms  2.190 ms  2.778 ms
 3  totulvafibine.rdsnet.ro (10.30.0.81)  18.681 ms  3.442 ms  13.972 ms
 4  xr01.londra.rdsnet.ro (10.220.134.206)  43.407 ms
    10.220.185.131 (10.220.185.131)  42.345 ms  41.551 ms
 5  ae15.mpr1.lhr15.uk.above.net (195.66.224.76)  43.154 ms  43.312 ms  43.227 ms
 6  * * *
 7  * * *
 8  ae21.mpr2.tor1.ca.us.zip.zayo.com (64.125.26.139)  118.422 ms  116.858 ms  117.826 ms
 9  zayo-allstream.mpr2.tor1.ca.zip.zayo.com (64.125.14.231)  118.937 ms  117.583 ms  117.372 ms
10  199.212.161.126 (199.212.161.126)  126.784 ms  126.746 ms  240.775 ms
11  216.191.235.18 (216.191.235.18)  127.497 ms  126.165 ms  126.486 ms
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *


But one of the lines on the way seems to somehow limit the traffic; access to www is also painfully slow.


Liviu



Back to the top