[epp-dev] About optional +1 (was Re: EPP 2020-09 RC2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[epp-dev] About optional +1 (was Re: EPP 2020-09 RC2)

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:14:54 +0200
Delivered-to: epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/epp-dev>
List-help: <mailto:epp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev>, <mailto:epp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/epp-dev>, <mailto:epp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:17 AM Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Please test and send your +1 to this mailing list. +1s are optional as the package will be published anyway.

For the future, rhouldn't we at least ask the package owner to give on explicit +1 for one of the RCs at least ?

With this approach of optional +1, it basically allows packages to be fully released continuously without anyone verifying them, it seems dangerous to me.

Cheers

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [epp-dev] About optional +1 (was Re: EPP 2020-09 RC2)
  - From: Gunnar Wagenknecht

References:
- [epp-dev] EPP 2020-09 RC2
  - From: Jonah Graham

Prev by Date: [epp-dev] EPP 2020-09 RC2
Next by Date: Re: [epp-dev] EPP 2020-09 RC2
Previous by thread: [epp-dev] EPP 2020-09 RC2
Next by thread: Re: [epp-dev] About optional +1 (was Re: EPP 2020-09 RC2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs