[epp-dev] Vote for Committer status for Andreas Sewe was started by Mark

[portal-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx (portal on behalf of )]

technology.packaging Committers,
This automatically generated message signals that Markus Knauer has
nominated Andreas Sewe as a Committer on the technology.packaging project.
The reason given is as follows:

Andreas is taking care of the successful and prominent Java package since a
long time now, and he is more than qualified to do this as the main package
maintainer.

During his testing (see the various mails on epp-dev) he found many smaller
and bigger issues, all of them documented in his mails to epp-dev and/or in
bug reports. I'm just mention a few from the last months:

http://eclip.se/488040
http://eclip.se/487713
http://eclip.se/484629

I'd like to have him on board, not only for allowing him to work on the
Java package.


The vote is being held via the MyFoundation portal: voters *must* use the
portal for the votes to be properly recorded.  The voting will continue
until either all 23 existing Committers have voted or until they have been
given enough time to vote, even if they do not do so (defined as at least
one week). Andreas Sewe must receive at least three +1s and no -1s for a
successful election.

Eligible Committers must cast their votes through their My Foundation
portal page (do NOT just reply to this email; your vote will not be
correctly recorded unless you use the portal):

    http://portal.eclipse.org/

The project Committers eligible to vote are:

    Wayne Beaton
    Chuck Bridgham
    Marcel Bruch
    Cedric Brun
    Eric Cloninger
    Stephan Eberle
    Andreas Hoegger
    Dennis Huebner
    Mickael Istria
    Jeff Johnston
    Markus Knauer
    Marc-Andre Laperle
    Henrik Lindberg
    Marvin Mueller
    Martin Oberhuber
    Steffen Pingel
    Jacek Pospychala
    Doug Schaefer
    Beth Tibbitts
    Markus Tiede
    Gunnar Wagenknecht
    David Williams
    Tomasz Zarna

*NOTE*: Successful elections are left open for a maximum of 120 days to
allow for processing of paperwork.  After that time the election will be
expired, regardless of its current status.  Should papework processing on
the part of the candidate take more time than allowed, a new election will
have to be held.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>