On 02/09/2016 04:40 PM, Mike
Milinkovich wrote:
I have, although it was over a year ago. It's ..... complicated.
The issues are mostly around the packaging requirements and the
legal terms and conditions. They are not insurmountable, but it
would be a non-trivial amount of technical, legal, and
administrative effort to get our packages into these channels.
Ok.
In
my humble opinion, if someone was volunteering to do more work in
this area getting up-to-date packages into the Debian and Ubuntu
apt repositories is where I would start. (I think you Red Hat folk
are already keeping it current on Fedora/yum, right?)
Yes, the Fedora/Eclipse team provides a pretty up-to-date and high
quality rpm/yum package for Eclipse IDE.
On a related note, some users regularly get older versions of
Eclipse IDE because of the very old .deb packages available for
Debian and Ubuntu. They sometimes even don't notice they're using
such an old version and don't consider finding a new one. That's the
purpose of https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=484765 .
Why
do you ask?
I'm wondering whether Windows Store would make "onboarding" of new
users to Eclipse IDE easier, to simply save them time. Being the
only real IDE in such a store may also be a big competitive
advantage.
The vast majority of Eclipse users are on Windows, so if we're to
consider better delivery, it's IMO by far the main one to consider
(more than the Debian/Ubuntu one).
|