Re: [epp-dev] Kepler SR1... and +1 votes

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree. And while I'd hate to set a precedent,
I'd say to go ahead and make it available even without Martin's +1. 

It is, after all, "just Eclipse
and EGit", which are in lots of other packages so suspect it is safe
or someone else would have noticed. I myself have used it some, though
didn't go through any "systematic testing".  We should make
sure something gets documented, for that package, at
 http://wiki.eclipse.org/EPP/Package_Testing

so others could do the  testing,
say if Martin has been on vacation or had a family emergency or something.


So, I'd give it my +0.5 :) 

In the future, we should know sooner
than Friday if a "vote is missing", so we can make other arrangements,
if we can't contact the maintainer. 

 



From:      
 Denis Roy <denis.roy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,

Date:      
 09/27/2013 10:30 AM
Subject:    
   Re: [epp-dev]
Kepler SR1... and +1 votes
Sent by:    
   epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

The Standard package is highlighted on our downloads page
and gets almost double the hits as the follow-up package.  Releasing
without it almost seems wrong, and I feel it may confuse our users.

This does highlight a weakness in our process, where our ability to release
hinges on a single person.

Denis



On 09/27/2013 10:19 AM, Markus Knauer wrote:
Hi package maintainers,

we are missing a +1 for the Eclipse Standard package.
I'm tempted to wait until 11am and if we don't get a +1 until then release
the remaining packages independently.

What do others think?

Thanks,
Markus


_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev

_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev