[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import
- From: Eric Gwin <eric.gwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:40:22 -0400
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Organization: Oracle Corporation
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:220.127.116.11) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 OracleBeehiveExtension/18.104.22.168-OracleInternal ObetStats/LAFCATCAF_1294839879169-914923201 Thunderbird/3.1.10
Hypothetically speaking: Doesn't it also mean that In January when a new version of CDT ships in the SR, that I wouldn't be able to update a separately installed 'My awesome C++ analysis tool' or to the SR package due to conflicting requirements (Without uninstalling something that is)?
On 20/03/2012 1:15 PM, Ian Bull wrote:
Included features means my Feature is expecting (and shipping) an exact version of CDT. So, for C/C++ EPP SR0 (June 2012) we likely want to indicate an 'exact' version of the CDT that ships. This means that in 10 years, if someone wants to re-create that version, it's easy (since the versions are baked into the features).