Re: [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import

From: Eric Gwin <eric.gwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:40:22 -0400
Delivered-to: epp-dev@eclipse.org
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 OracleBeehiveExtension/1.0.0.2-OracleInternal ObetStats/LAFCATCAF_1294839879169-914923201 Thunderbird/3.1.10

Ian,

Hypothetically speaking: Doesn't it also mean that In January when a new version of CDT ships in the SR, that I wouldn't be able to update a separately installed 'My awesome C++ analysis tool' or to the SR package due to conflicting requirements (Without uninstalling something that is)?

-Eric

On 20/03/2012 1:15 PM, Ian Bull wrote:

Included features means my Feature is expecting (and shipping) an exact version of CDT.  So, for C/C++ EPP SR0 (June 2012) we likely want to indicate an 'exact' version of the CDT that ships.  This means that in 10 years, if someone wants to re-create that version, it's easy (since the versions are baked into the features).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import
  - From: Eric Gwin

References:
- [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import
  - From: Doug Schaefer
- Re: [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import
  - From: Ian Bull

Prev by Date: Re: [epp-dev] EPP Packaging
Next by Date: Re: [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import
Previous by thread: Re: [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import
Next by thread: Re: [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread