Re: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package

From: Beth Tibbitts <tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:21:42 -0400
Delivered-to: epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/epp-dev>
List-help: <mailto:epp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev>, <mailto:epp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/epp-dev>, <mailto:epp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

>And then I thought this morning that if we have the case with one package being a subset of another it could be easier to consume the feature that defines the other package than to manage another redundant list.
>In this case: If PTP has the same feature set as CPP plus some additional features, it could add org.eclipse.epp.package.cpp.feature to its feature instead of keeping a redundant list of features itself.

We don't include *all* the cpp package features but almost all. I noted this in a ptp-dev post yesterday, http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ptp-dev/msg06293.html

...Beth

Beth Tibbitts
Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform http://eclipse.org/ptp
IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools
Mailing Address: IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511

Doug Schaefer ---03/21/2012 10:51:11 AM---Yes, I forgot to add it to the b3 files. It's checked in now. Doug

From:	Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
To:	Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:	03/21/2012 10:51 AM
Subject:	Re: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package
Sent by:	epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Yes, I forgot to add it to the b3 files. It's checked in now.

Doug

From: Markus Knauer <mknauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:26:36 +0100
To: Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package

For your information: Both, CPP and PTP package builds are failing due to some features (org.eclipse.ptp.pldt.fortran, org.eclipse.cdt.autotools) that are (currently? not yet?) available from /releases/staging.

And then I thought this morning that if we have the case with one package being a subset of another it could be easier to consume the feature that defines the other package than to manage another redundant list.
In this case: If PTP has the same feature set as CPP plus some additional features, it could add org.eclipse.epp.package.cpp.feature to its feature instead of keeping a redundant list of features itself.

Regards,
Markus

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 21:14, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes.

On 03/20/2012 04:02 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:

Yeah, I'm adding the autotools feature to CDT's. Jeff, does that mean we
can remove the linuxtools.autotools feature from the includes?

On 12-03-20 4:01 PM, "Jeff Johnston"<

jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx

> wrote:

Hey Beth,

The autotools feature in the parallel feature.xml should be changed to
reference the new CDT one (org.eclipse.cdt.autotools). Other than that,
everything else from linuxtools remains the same.

-- Jeff J.

On 03/20/2012 03:36 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:

Hey, Beth. The changes are already applied for Linux tools. I don't
think I need to change them any further at this point, at least for M6.

From: Beth Tibbitts<

tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx

<mailto:

tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx

>>
Reply-To: Eclipse Packaging Project<

Breadcrumbs