Re: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package

[Beth Tibbitts <tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx>]

OK I was assuming that and grabbing yours now...

...Beth

Beth Tibbitts
Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform  http://eclipse.org/ptp
IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools
Mailing Address:  IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511

Doug Schaefer ---03/20/2012 03:43:56 PM---Hey, Beth. The changes are already applied for Linux tools. I don't think I need to change them any

From:	Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
To:	Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:	03/20/2012 03:43 PM
Subject:	Re: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package
Sent by:	epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Hey, Beth. The changes are already applied for Linux tools. I don't think I need to change them any further at this point, at least for M6.

From: Beth Tibbitts <tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:21:13 -0400
To: Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package

I was just going to update the Parallel package today too, Doug.

My original contents were CPP, plus some of Linux tools and of course PTP and Photran.
I think I should get the new CPP list now.
Let me know when you are done.


...Beth

Beth Tibbitts
Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform  http://eclipse.org/ptp
IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools
Mailing Address:  IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511

Doug Schaefer ---03/20/2012 12:20:43 PM---Hey gang, Looking through the changes Linuxtools made to the CPP package to merge the two, I noticed

From:	Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
To:	"epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:	03/20/2012 12:20 PM
Subject:	[epp-dev] Include versus requires/import
Sent by:	epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Hey gang,

Looking through the changes Linuxtools made to the CPP package to merge the two, I noticed that they Include their features as opposed to add them to the required section. I assume this was to allow for optionality. Should we be including all our features this way? What's the difference between include and require?

Thanks,
Doug._______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev


_______________________________________________ epp-dev mailing list epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev _______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev