Re: [epp-dev] Indigo respin - RC5 EPP packages

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Bug
349464 - some surprising differences between
RC4 and RC5

Turns out, most of these differences
were expected, or didn't matter ... but, there were some "missing
bundles" that were a result of Gyrex not being in the repository at
the time the packages were created. For this reason (or, this general type
of reason) I think the packages should be regenerated, once the repository
is final. That's my opinion. Others welcome. Here's the wordy post I added
to bug 349267
.

= = = = = 

For what its worth ... just to show
how there can be indirect effects of the
"content of the repo" on EPP
package builds ... I've discovered some bundles
(listed below) are not in our EPP packages
... at least JEE and _javascript_, and
that they are contributed by Gyrex (which
had no contribution in the repo, at
the time the packages were built). 

So, someone somewhere must have an optional
dependency on them, so the current
behavior of p2 (and repo publishing)
is to include all optional bundles it
finds in a repository (whether required
by a feature, or not). 

Hence, I think best to respin the EPP
packages once final repository is ready. 

> org.apache.lucene.highlighter_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar
> org.apache.lucene.memory_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar
> org.apache.lucene.misc_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar
> org.apache.lucene.queries_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar
> org.apache.lucene.snowball_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar
> org.apache.lucene.spellchecker_2.9.1.v20100421-0704.jar

I've no idea what function these bundles
provide ... but since users will have
them installed if installing from the
repo, I think the EPP packages should
have them too. Sound right?

        







From:      
 David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To:      
 Eclipse Packaging Project
<epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:      
 06/15/2011 12:00 PM
Subject:    
   Re: [epp-dev]
Indigo respin - RC5 EPP packages
Sent by:    
   epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

I've seen some unexpected changes in
the JEE and JS packages ... are others seeing similar changes? 

Bug
349464 - some surprising differences between
RC4 and RC5 

As far as I tell, everything still "works" ... presumably better,
now with file handle fix :) ... but .... some differences seem odd, so
thought it'd be best to discuss. 




From:        Markus
Knauer <mknauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
To:        EPP
Developer Mailing List <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        06/15/2011
07:22 AM 
Subject:        Re:
[epp-dev] Indigo respin - RC5 EPP packages 
Sent by:        epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Hi *,

if you have the time it would be good if you can start testing the build
below as soon as possible; please send +1/-1 votes as always to this list.

I haven't had the time to look into the build results so far, but that
shouldn't prevent you from testing. This unplanned '20110615-0608-indigo-RC5'
build is another candidate for the release next week if there are no rebuild
requests, so this one is hopefully the last.

Thanks, Markus



On 15 June 2011 09:05, Markus Knauer <mknauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote: 
Since everybody is reading the cross-projects mailing list (you do, don't
you?) you have seen that there is a severe bug
349105 that made it necessary to rebuild
the Indigo common repository and as a consequence all EPP packages. See
bug
349267 for a general overview of what's
going on and how it is coordinated.

I started a new package build in Hudson

  https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/indigo.epp-package-build/39/

and its output can be found here

  http://build.eclipse.org/technology/epp/epp_build/indigo/download/20110615-0608/

When this build is ready and if it is successful, I will ask for testing
and voting once again.

Thanks, Markus 


_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev