| Re: help needed: Fwd: [epp-dev] Galileo SR1 schedule |
Hi Markus,Does this apply to this particular platform only or is it apparent in other platforms as well? The reason I ask is that I don't think that macosx.x86_64 is one of the platforms that are included in the Galileo repository and IIRC the Galileo repository is the source of input for the build.
- thomas On 09/18/2009 06:19 PM, Markus Knauer wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I just checked what Eric wrote below and found out that he is not only
right, it is a real problem in the packages that I haven't seen in the past:
In the .product files the packages define their own product and add this
parameter to the eclipse.ini - at least that is the plan and it worked all
the time.
<launcherArgs>
<programArgs>-product
org.eclipse.epp.package.java.product</programArgs>
....
Is this something that could be caused by Buckminster?
Or could it be caused by the additional Buckminster "build" step before the
"perform" that I had to introduce in order to build the WTP intro pages and
the capabilities plugins?
And why is the EPP repo build now creating those binary artifacts as can be
seen in
http://build.eclipse.org/technology/epp/epp_repo/galileo/epp.build/buildresult/org.eclipse.epp.allpackages.feature_1.2.1-eclipse.feature/site.p2/?
Thanks and regards,
Markus
References:
- Repository build:
https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/epp-repository-build/228/
- Output: Build 20090918-0704 from http://www.eclipse.org/epp/download.php
- Exemplary product file:
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.epp/packages/org.eclipse.epp.package.java.feature/epp.product?root=Technology_Project&view=markup
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eric Rizzo<eclipse-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2009/9/18
Subject: Re: [epp-dev] Galileo SR1 schedule
To: Eclipse Packaging Project<epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
First thing I notice about today's macosx.x86_64 build of the Java package
is that the branding (About dialog, Welcome screen, splash screen [is that
even branded for packages?]) seems to be from the plaform, not the Java IDE
branding.
Should we file bug reports for this stuff?
Eric
_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev