[epf-dev] Discussions on new FACESEM process standard heats up

[Bruce Macisaac <bmacisaa@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Note that today is the last day to register as a voting member
on FACESEM.
If you are interested in being a voting member, contact:
Juergen Boldt <juergen@xxxxxxx>, 
Tel:  781 444 0404 x 132
fax:  781 444 0320

The RFP is here: 
http://www.omg.org/techprocess/meetings/schedule/FACESEM_RFP.html

Submission from SEMAT is here:

http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/2012-02-04

Submission from Softeam (based on ISO standard) is here:
http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/2012-02-05

Submission from Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
is here (in two parts - one being a zipfile of other files):
http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/2012-02-06
and http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/2012-02-07


I have only reviewed the SEMAT submission
thus far.  My position is that the kernel, and the concept of alpha
states, is a good idea, but
that creating a new language to define
the kernel is not.

I've attached my thoughts on that.


I would appreciate others reviewing
these submissions and sharing your thoughts.

Bruce MacIsaac
EPF Project Co-lead
bmacisaa@xxxxxxxxxx
408-250-3037 (cell)

Attachment: mapping_sematv11_to_spem.xls
Description: MS-Excel spreadsheet

Attachment: SEMAT_submission_v11_bm_comments.doc
Description: Binary data

Attachment: proposed_requirements_for_process_definition_language.doc
Description: Binary data