Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [epf-dev] EPF Practices
Hi Jeffrey,
The short answer of what I think is that it reflects the prize we pay for extensibility and configurability. Your questions more or less suggest that you feel the arrangement is less than optimal from the perspective of understanding what is there. I agree.

Again this is just my opinion and impression but I think it is the result of having refactored the content into bits that allow you to easily create a configuration with just the practices you are interested in.

I expect that it should be a little more clearer if you read the stuff on Method Development and Project Process Tailoring.
Best Regards,
Onno

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Jeffrey Isaacs <Jeffrey.isaacs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello EPF Dev,

I have recently started working with EPF and have used the OpenUP 1.5.1.1 practices baseline as my starting point.

Would you be able to explain the rationale for using Eclipse packages to organise the content library?

Specifically, what the advantages are to adopting this architectural arrangement of a content library?

Regards,

Jeffrey Isaacs 

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy by an authorised signatory.  The contents of this email may relate to dealings with other companies within the Detica Limited group of companies.

Detica Limited is registered in England under No: 1337451.

Registered offices: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP, England.

_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev


Back to the top