Hi Jim,
we created our company process model with EPFC. this mean that
we described processes not just for SW development, but for whole organisation.
Concerning role of OpenUP ... this is a nice inspiration, but
as probably all organisations we have to make tailoring and we found that is
better to set up new Method Library with our own content.
yours sincerely,
JAN MASARYK
Director of Coordination & Strategy Support
Asseco Central Europe
Contact Information:
Asseco Slovakia, a.s.
Trenčianska 56/A, 821 09 Bratislava
Slovak Republic
Phone: + 421-2-20 838 537
e-mail: jan.masaryk@xxxxxxxxx
www.asseco.sk
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Jim Ruehlin
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 6:23 PM
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
Subject: [epf-dev] Query: Who is Building Stand-alone EPF Content?
Hello,
I'm interested in finding out how many people are creating content using EPF
Composer, but are not using the EPF Practice Library. Or, you're just using the
EPF Practice Library for a minority of the content you publish. It would be
useful to understand how many organizations are creating a (comparatively)
large amount of content as opposed to creating small extensions to existing
practices.
I'd appreciate it if you could respond to the newsgroup or to me personally if
you prefer with a quick note letting me know approximately how many
pages/elements you're creating, and the nature of the project (large enterprise
content deployment, content that covers specialized areas, etc).
This is useful for the EPF community to know as people want to provide services
or training around the way the tool and content is actually being used.
Much thanks,
Jim Ruehlin, EPF Committer
Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational Software
Method Architect, ADC CoP
RMC SIG Lead
jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx
voice: 949.545.8912
