[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [epf-dev] Question about published work product descriptors
|
Disculpa Javier. NO ví que eras precisamente tu quien hacia la pregunta.
----------------------------------------------
Francisco Ruiz Gonzalez
Dep. de Tecnologías y Sistemas de Información
Escuela Superior de Informática
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Paseo de la Universidad, 4
13071 Ciudad Real (ESPAÑA/SPAIN)
tlf: +34.926-295300 ext 3741
fax: +34.926-295354
email: francisco.ruizg@xxxxxxx
web: http://alarcos.inf-cr.uclm.es/per/fruiz/
----------------------------------------------
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] En
> nombre de Javier Verdugo Lara
> Enviado el: martes, 05 de febrero de 2008 10:01
> Para: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Asunto: [epf-dev] Question about published work product descriptors
>
> Hello,
> I've got a question about published work product descriptors.
>
> This is the scenario:
> 1) We have 3 capability patterns "a", "b" & "c".
> 2) We add several tasks that use a work product "p" to "a", "b" & "c" (so
> we have 3 descriptors for that work product, one for every capability
> pattern)
> 3) We have another capability pattern "d" where we apply "a", "b" & "c"
> (with extended variability).
> 4) We publish the cp "d" and see the "Work product usage" tab.
> 5) The descriptor published for "p" in "d" it's the descriptor published
> in "a".
>
> Is it the intended behavior?
> I think the descriptor published por "p" in "d" should be an aggregation
> of the descriptors in "a", "b" & "c", at least in their relationships, as
> the aggregation of their textual descriptions wouldn't be easy.
>
> Thanks in advance for your response,
> Javier.
> _______________________________________________
> epf-dev mailing list
> epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
