Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [epf-dev] Triage on bugs assigned to 1.0.0.


Comments on the bugs proposed to be postponed to 1.0.1:

Test
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159369
Comment #7 on this bug says: "Suggest closing this bug.  All the individual issues are either already
addressed or separated into individual bugs"
So, this one should close it, not moved to 1.0.1.

Deployment
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=140074
As part of the success criteria for 1.0 we said we should have plug-ins extending OpenUP/Basic. Deployment would be a candidate. Unless Deployment becomes one of the disciplines in OpenUP/Basic itself.
What's the decision on plug-in vs. discipline? Any reason for postponing it to 1.0.1?

MDD  
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=138867
This also would be an extension to OpenUP/Basic. Where do we stand at? What are the plans for this plug-in? Is it in good shape for starting the due diligence process?
Given that, we should move it to 1.0.1, as there may not be time for due diligence before 1.0 is released.

I leave the other bugs for the content owners to comment on.

Thanks,

Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer

IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational)
Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf)



Jim Ruehlin/Irvine/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/11/2007 12:47 PM

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[epf-dev] Triage on bugs assigned to 1.0.0.





These bugs are currently not assigned to any iteration. They’re just in the 1.0.0 bucket. I did a triage and I propose we reassign these bugs to the iterations described below, and assign them to the package owner if they’re not already assigned.
 
Since there are a lot of these, I suggest we respond if we have an exception. Unless there are objections, I’ll move these on Tuesday 4/17. If you’re already the owner of one of these, feel free to reassign it yourself.
 
FYI, there were a couple of duplicates with bugs already assigned to iterations. I went ahead and closed them.
 
Close (bugs flagged as WONTFIX)
PM
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146456
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160070
 
 
Move to M7 (C2)
PM
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146476
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171122
 
Dev
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=147178
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168730
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168739
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168736
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168728
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171110
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171253
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171114
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168735
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170906
 
Test
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169626
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171260
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174072
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172698
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172799
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171257
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169616
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169618
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169617
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169623
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169614
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169621
 
General
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171250
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170354
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170809
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=176112
 
 
Move to M8 (C3)
Dev
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=176260
 
Test
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=176259
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174081
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171088
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174066
 
General
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=154628
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=164685
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146489
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146499
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=147135
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=164196
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=175219
 
 
Move to M9 (T1)
General
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=170420
 
Website
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174094
 
Move to 1.0.1
PM
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146439
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146453
 
Development
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171118
 
Test
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159369
 
General
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174097
 
 
MDD
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=138867
 
Deployment
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=140074
 
 
 
 
____________________
Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational
RUP Content Developer
Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer www.eclipse.org/epf
email:   jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx
phone:  760.505.3232
fax:      949.369.0720
 _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev


Back to the top