Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [epf-dev] Vote on architecture principle

Hi,

Thanks for clarifying the procedure for voting.

Kind regards
Jaana Nyfjord

 Hi,
>
> just a comment on how I suggest we handle voting in general:
>
> When formal voting, and it is a sensitive issue (such as who should be
> committer, projects really being divided) I would go for strictly
> committers.
> When we are more trying to get a feel for what is the preferred solution,
> I would opt to allow anybody to vote, to get a broad set of perspectives,
> and to make sure that people feel involved.
>
> Now, there are naturally some border cases, when is something a sensitive
> issue or not... In this case, if a committer feel strongly about the vote,
> and feel this should be a committer only vote, they should be able to
> request it.
>
> I think handling voting in the above fashion is fair to everybody and
> gives us broad participation without going outside Eclipse bylaws...
>
> <To clarify, this voting was fine as long as no committer strongly
> complains>
>
> Cheers
>
> Per Kroll
> STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
> Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
> Rational Software, IBM Corp
> (M) 408-219-2963
>
>
>
> "Ben Williams" <Ben.Williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 03/27/2007 09:04 AM
> Please respond to
> Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> To
> "Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: [epf-dev] Vote on architecture principle
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
> I wondered ? is this voting only for current committers?
>
> I haven?t seen any objections yet to the nominations of Ana, Nate and
> myself, but I don?t think its been  ratified yet..
>
> Either way ? in case my opinion does count for something, I vote for
> number 8 also.
>
> Ben
>
> From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Ricardo Balduino
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:50 PM
> To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
> Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Vote on architecture principle
>
>
>>From the list below I like (and vote for) #8.
>
> Ricardo Balduino
> Senior Software Engineer
>
> IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational)
> EPF Committer (www.eclipse.org/epf)
>
>
>
> "Jaana Nyfjord" <jaana@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 03/21/2007 08:07 PM
>
>
> Please respond to
> Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> To
> epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> cc
>
> Subject
> [epf-dev] Vote on architecture principle
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all!
>
> The vote is now open. There are twelve eminent proposals of how to present
> the core architecture principle.
>
> Please, vote on the formulation you want to represent the core
> architecture principle. Send your vote by quoting the number of the
> formulation to this list (epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx).
>
> The vote will be open from Thursday March 22 and end Tuesday March 27
> (Pacific Time).
>
> Depending on the results of the vote of this round, there may be another
> round to nail the preferred formulation.
>
> 1. "Focus on articulating the architecture? (currently on the web)
>
> 2. "Focus on the architecture to promote a shared view of the solution"
>
> 3. "Focus on articulating the architecture to retire risks early in the
> project lifecycle"
>
> 4. "Focus on the architecture to retire risks early"
>
> 5.  ?Explore/articulate the architecture to address technical risks early?
>
> 6.  ?Focus on capitalizing on risk as an opportunity to advance current
> capabilities in the project?.
>
> 7.  ?Focus on architecture to exploit risk as an opportunity to advance
> current capabilities in the project.?
>
> 8.  "Focus on the architecture early to minimize risks and organize
> development"
>
> 9.  "Focus on architecture in early iterations to achieve overall system
> stability"
>
> 10. ?Focus on eliminating technical risk early to increase stability and
> predictability?
>
> 11. ?Express and mature the architecture while reducing the risk in the
> solution?
>
> 12.  ?Focus on the architecture to both promote a shared view of the
> solution and capitalize on risk as an opportunity to advance current
> capabilities in the project?
>
> Cheers,
> Jaana Nyfjord
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> epf-dev mailing list
> epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Telelogic Lifecycle Solutions:
> Helping You Define, Design & Deliver Advanced Systems & Software
> Learn More at www.telelogic.com
>
> Ben Williams
> Product Manager, Lifecycle Solutions
> Telelogic UK Ltd, Northbrook House, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, OX4 4GA,
> United Kingdom
> Phone: +44 (7710) 637 067
> Fax: +44 (1865) 784 286
> Mobile phone: +44 (7710) 637 067
> Ben.Williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.telelogic.com
> Telelogic - Requirements-Driven Innovation!
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment or
> enclosure, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential material. Any unauthorized use,
> review, retransmissions, dissemination, copying or other use of this
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited.
>   _______________________________________________
> epf-dev mailing list
> epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> epf-dev mailing list
> epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
>




Back to the top