[epf-dev] Important! Attention Required for M5 Bugzilla Entries

[Jim Ruehlin <jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Below is the current status of bugzilla entries for M5. All of these
need to be either closed or moved to future iterations before Wednesday,
March 7. Please check each category below and see if your email address
appears. If so, please take the appropriate measures for the associated
bugzillas.

 

Thanks,

Jim

 

New (2)

blyons@xxxxxxxxxxx 

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168778 - Needs to be
accepted & addressed. Recommend moving to M6. This blocks 168734.

 

rbellamkonda@xxxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167929 - This has been
hanging around since M4 and not yet accepted. Recommend changing to
WontFix and closing.

 

Assigned (10)

aitor.bediaga@xxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167920 - A plan has been
posted, so the bug should be changed to Resolved/Fixed by ESI. Then it
can be Verified by Per and Closed. 

 

apereira@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167904 - This needs a
review but it won't be done for M5. Recommend moving to M6 and make this
a higher priority within OpenUP.

 

balduino@xxxxxxxxxx 

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160944 - Recommend moving
to M6.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=164686 - Recommend moving
to M6.

 

blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168731 - Recommend moving
to M6 but raise the priority - it's been moved forward since M4.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168727 - Recommend moving
to M6 and raise the priority

 

chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167933 - Recommend moving
to M6. This is been moved forward since M4 so the priority should be
re-evaluated.

 

Unassigned

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172732 - Recommend moving
to M6. Need to assign this bug to someone - Brian Lyons reported it so
perhaps he can take it.

 

mark.dickson@xxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=166626 - Recommend moving
to M6 as we're still waiting on Eclipse legal.

 

swa@xxxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167908 - Recommend moving
to M6 and evaluating the priority as it's been moved forward since M4.

 

Resolved (15)

These bugs still need to be Verified. If your name is associated with
any of these, you either need to verify it or it couldn't be verified
and there are comments in the bug you need to address.

 

blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=166623

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165217

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168734

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=166879

 

jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx 

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174030

 

noster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=173474 

 

Chris.Sibbald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174990

 

balduino@xxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159570

 

These architecture bugs are being discussed in the context of a new
architectural approach. The group working on the architecture area needs
to create more specific, targeted bugzillas and close these entries. As
this may take a couple of weeks, the recommendation is to move these to
M6 and expect them to be closed after the new bugs are created.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160074

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165236

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165238

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165245

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172800

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172250

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169273

 

 

 

Verified (16)

If you're responsible for any of these bugs, please close them.

 

mark.dickson@xxxxxxxxx 

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165243

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165219

 

ben.williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167270

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167909

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167279

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167919

 

 

blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172257

 

kurt.sand@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167931

 

swa@xxxxxxxxxxxx

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168873

 

Chris.Sibbald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168275

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167852

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167888

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167281

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167439

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167869

 

noster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171101

 

 

 

 

____________________

Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational

RUP Content Developer

Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer www.eclipse.org/epf

email:   jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx

phone:  760.505.3232

fax:      949.369.0720