| [epf-dev] Important! Attention Required for M5 Bugzilla Entries |
Below is the current status of bugzilla entries for M5. All of these need to be either closed or moved to future iterations before Wednesday, March 7. Please check each category below and see if your email address appears. If so, please take the appropriate measures for the associated bugzillas. Thanks, Jim New (2) blyons@xxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168778 - Needs to be accepted & addressed. Recommend moving to M6. This blocks 168734. rbellamkonda@xxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167929 - This has been hanging around since M4 and not yet accepted. Recommend changing to WontFix and closing. Assigned (10) aitor.bediaga@xxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167920 - A plan has been posted, so the bug should be changed to Resolved/Fixed by ESI. Then it can be Verified by Per and Closed. apereira@xxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167904 - This needs a review but it won't be done for M5. Recommend moving to M6 and make this a higher priority within OpenUP. balduino@xxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160944 - Recommend moving to M6. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=164686 - Recommend moving to M6. blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168731 - Recommend moving to M6 but raise the priority - it's been moved forward since M4. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168727 - Recommend moving to M6 and raise the priority chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167933 - Recommend moving to M6. This is been moved forward since M4 so the priority should be re-evaluated. Unassigned https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172732 - Recommend moving to M6. Need to assign this bug to someone - Brian Lyons reported it so perhaps he can take it. mark.dickson@xxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=166626 - Recommend moving to M6 as we're still waiting on Eclipse legal. swa@xxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167908 - Recommend moving to M6 and evaluating the priority as it's been moved forward since M4. Resolved (15) These bugs still need to be Verified. If your name is associated with any of these, you either need to verify it or it couldn't be verified and there are comments in the bug you need to address. blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=166623 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165217 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168734 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=166879 jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174030 noster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=173474 Chris.Sibbald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=174990 balduino@xxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159570 These architecture bugs are being discussed in the context of a new architectural approach. The group working on the architecture area needs to create more specific, targeted bugzillas and close these entries. As this may take a couple of weeks, the recommendation is to move these to M6 and expect them to be closed after the new bugs are created. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=160074 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165236 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165238 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165245 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172800 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172250 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=169273 Verified (16) If you're responsible for any of these bugs, please close them. mark.dickson@xxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165243 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=165219 ben.williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167270 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167909 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167279 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167919 blyons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172257 kurt.sand@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167931 swa@xxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168873 Chris.Sibbald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168275 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167852 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167888 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167281 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167439 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167869 noster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=171101 ____________________ Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational RUP Content Developer Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer www.eclipse.org/epf email: jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx phone: 760.505.3232 fax: 949.369.0720