[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [epf-dev] E1 Iteration Assessment and E2 Iteration Plan
|
Ricardo,
let's remove that objective. Since we
have decided what should be done, there is no point treating the XP inclusion
work any differently than any other requested content changes.... we just
need to make sure to execute on 25% of total changes in each iteration,
whether it is related to XP or not....
Cheers
Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
(M) 408-219-2963
Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/01/2007 09:06 PM
|
Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers
List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Re: [epf-dev] E1 Iteration Assessment
and E2 Iteration Plan |
|
I have one comment about the following objective planned for the current
iteration:
Incorporate XP content in OpenUP – Part 1
– Ricardo
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=167902
According to discussions during the resolution of this bug, new bugs were
created per content area suggesting the agreed XP content to be added.
The bug referenced above has been closed.
The expectation is that each package owner would deal with the respective
bugs in their areas.
Should that be part of the iteration plan instead of the bug above?
Cheers,
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM Rational (www.ibm.com/rational)
EPF Committer (www.eclipse.org/epf)
Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
01/31/2007 07:52 PM
|
Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "EPF Dev " <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [epf-dev] E1 Iteration Assessment and
E2 Iteration Plan |
|
Hi,
attached you find the outcome of today's assessment and planning meeting.
Feedback is appreciated.
If you own a bug that has not been closed for M4 (E1), the please either
ensure it is closed asap, or move to M5 (E2). It is increasingly obvious
that we
- Are not tracking to plan. We need to discuss appropriate actions in our
F2F next week.
- Need new fresh blood that can help reinvigorate OpenUP development activities
and build a community also around XP content
There are also a number of positives
- XP donation completed
- Good progress in several packages, such as requirements mgmt, architecture,
development, and general
- Reinvigorated discussions around test
For status, see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/report.cgi?x_axis_field=bug_status&y_axis_field=assigned_to&z_axis_field=target_milestone&query_format=report-table&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Technology&product=EPF&component=Content&version=0.9&version=1.0&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=2006-11-01&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&format=table&action=""
Cheers
Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
(M) 408-219-2963[attachment "E2 - Iteration Plan - EPF 2 0 Content.doc"
deleted by Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM] [attachment "E1 - Iteration
Assessment.doc" deleted by Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM] _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
