Re: [epf-dev] Package owner call - PM status

[Per Kroll <pkroll@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Chris and others,

I may not be able to participate in
tomorrow's call due to an emergency, so here is my input in case I cannot
make it.

Of the bugzilla entries I am responsible
for, I suggest that we descope (for Sep 30 release):
<<I have not seen meeting minutes
from DC meeting, so I do not know if this is consistent with discussions
there or not>>

Checklists:
Row 9:

Row 12:

I think you can manage without Checklists....
Should we remove all Checklists?


Examples:
Row 23:

Row 25:

Should we remove all Examples?
I know Examples are really good to look
at, so we may want to keep them...


I also heard that there were discussions
around descoping guidelines, but I felt my guidelines:
Row 26:

Row 32:

are crucial to understand these concepts,
so I would like to keep them, and I will committ to get them at least to
state Resolved in this iteration..

I would however favor skipping a lot
of other guidelines, such as
Row 27:

Row 28:

Row 29:

<<I could cover that topic in either Conept Iteration or Guideline:
Iteration planning>>
Row 39:

Row 40:

I am sure a lot of other Guidelines
could be descoped.



Also, I would appreciate a quick sanity
check on the following items so I can put them into state resolved, see
attached (For some reason, I could not access Bugzilla right now, so I
will do updates over the weekend if not before.) Also, it would be great
to have a volunteer to further review what I am working on, see attached:
Row 49:

Row 51:

 <<Proposed
name: Manage Iteration>>
Row 57:

Row 61:

<Only the 4 items mentioned above
are read for review at thsi time>



Cheers

Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815

"Chris Armstrong" <chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

08/16/2006 09:18 AM

Please respond to
chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"'Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List'" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[epf-dev] Package owner call - PM status

I'll be unable to participate in this morning's
package owner call. I'm still working on quantifying things, but we do
have several items that are resolved (or pretty close), so we should be
in a position to review some stuff shortly (perhaps at this Friday's PM
call). I've had great response from people volunteering to help and am
working to get my arms around the priorities and assignments. Again, hope
to have that together for Friday's call.

Thanks, Chris ~:|

Chris Armstrong ~:|
President
Armstrong Process Group, Inc.
651.491.5575 c
715.246.0383 f
www.aprocessgroup.com
    "proven practical process"

Come see APG at:
---------------
Eclipse Process Framework F2F Meeting - www.eclipse.org/epf
Washington, DC, August 10-11, 2006
---------------
14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference
Minneapolis, MN, September 11-15, 2006 - www.re06.org _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev

Attachment: PM Content that Per is responsible for v0.3.doc
Description: Binary data