Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [epf-dev] Architecture Content Completed

Hi Jim,

I’m interested in contributing to the top-to-bottom review, so you can put me on the list.

Best Regards,

Onno

 


From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Ruehlin
Sent: dinsdag 15 augustus 2006 22:53
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [epf-dev] Architecture Content Completed

 

Based on what we agreed on at the last committers meeting, if the content has gone through an initial (informal) review, then it can be changed Verified – Fixed in Bugzilla (after the appropriate changes have been made). This review should include making sure the content conforms to the published guidelines.

 

The next step is to make sure the content is consistent across the process and robust enough for use. This second (formal) review should include the package owner, and probably someone from outside the discipline to give a different perspective. The Bugzilla entry can be changed to Closed after the changes have been made from this review.

 

In addition to those steps we’ve agreed to, there should be a top-to-bottom review of the process before final committer approval of version 1.0. We should enlist people who are monitoring this list but who haven’t contributed yet. Anyone interested? J

 

- Jim

 

____________________

Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational

RUP Content Developer

Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer

email:   jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx

phone:  760.505.3232

fax:      949.369.0720

 


From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark.Dickson@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 11:12 AM
To: "Epf" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Architecture Content Completed

 

Hi Ricardo
I've recently asked Brian and Per for guidance on closure. No answer yet but I'm happy to close bugs if that's the process.
As for the references issue - yes, I'm familiar with what your saying, as I added a bunch of references to the general package over the weekend. I obviously missed a couple, so thanks for spotting those.
Cheers
Mark
Mark Dickson
SE&E Practice
Xansa
0780 1917480
*** sent from my blackberry ***


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Ricardo Balduino [balduino@xxxxxxxxxx]
  Sent: 15/08/2006 19:03
  To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Architecture Content Completed



Mark, I know we briefly mentioned something in the Architecture call this morning, but I was wondering if the process is to have each package owner conducting the required reviews to close the bugs in Bugzilla, as opposed to relying in one person (as content leadership/ownership has been sliced and shared).

Regarding the current entries for Architecture in Bugzilla, I found minor things we can do to keep consistent with other areas, like removing 'Reference' sections from the text and creating links to the appropriate guidance References, under General package. As I found this change specific to some elements, I reopened the related bugs, but I guess if that behavior is generalized, we could open a new bug instead, as you suggested below. Let's sync up on this, please.

Cheers,

Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer

IBM - RUP Team | EPF Committer
www.ibm.com/rational
www.eclipse.org/epf

Mark.Dickson@xxxxxxxxx
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

08/15/2006 09:37 AM

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To

epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

cc

 

Subject

[epf-dev] Architecture Content Completed

 

 

 




Hi

The Architecture content is pretty much done and verified. We might get a
few more issues as people move through the content from an
"integration/system test" perspective - if so, can I ask that new bugzilla
entries are raised against these specific issues?

I have left the completed bugzillas as "Verified" where I believe they
comply with authoring and style guidelines, etc. My guess is that Brian (as
OpenUP content lead) should decide when to move bugs to "Closed" as it
gives us a final "we're really, really sure" status code we can move
through if needed.

This means that we don't need to have any Architecture Content status calls
anymore unless we really have to. I'll cancel the ones already in the Yahoo
calendar. If we need one in the future then we can schedule one up to suit
the occasion.

Finally, "thank you" to everyone who has helped with the Architecture
content so far, especially Ana Valente Pereira, Chris Doyle, Ricardo
Balduino and Jim Ruehlin.

cheers

Mark

Mark Dickson
Principal Solution Architect
SAE Practice
m 0780 1917480
w www.xansa.com
e mark.dickson@xxxxxxxxx


Whilst this email has been checked for all known viruses, recipients should undertake their own virus checking as Xansa will not accept any liability whatsoever.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and protected by client privilege.  It is solely for the use of the intended recipient.
Please delete it and notify the sender if you have received it in
error. Unauthorised use is prohibited.

Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not
necessarily the organisation.
    Xansa, Registered Office: 420 Thames Valley Park Drive,
    Thames Valley Park, Reading, RG6 1PU, UK.
    Registered in England No.1000954.
    t  +44 (0)8702 416181
    w  www.xansa.com
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev


Whilst this email has been checked for all known viruses, recipients should undertake their own virus checking as Xansa will not accept any liability whatsoever.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and protected by client privilege. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient.
Please delete it and notify the sender if you have received it in
error. Unauthorised use is prohibited.

Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not
necessarily the organisation.
Xansa, Registered Office: 420 Thames Valley Park Drive,
Thames Valley Park, Reading, RG6 1PU, UK.
Registered in England No.1000954.
t +44 (0)8702 416181
w www.xansa.com
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev



This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.


Back to the top