[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [epf-dev] Next PM conf call
|
Ricardo, it sounds like Friday would work pretty well for
most people, so think your suggestion of 9am PST, Friday (16 Jun) sounds good to
me. Let me know how the triage goes... :-) The Work Items List and Iteration
Plan ("List 1 and List 2") topics are at the top of the list of items to review.
I'm hoping to have some more content and examples to review prior to then, so we
have something concrete to look at.
Thanks, Chris ~:|
Chris, For me, this call could be on Friday. Would a 1-hour time
slot right after the core principles meeting work for people (9-10 AM
PDT)? I'd recommend Friday instead of
tomorrow, so people have sometime to look at the list of bugs you created in
Bugzilla. I have to do the initial bug triage, so I can spend some time on it
before the meeting. As for
prioritization of topics to discuss, I would strongly recommend the open issue
on Work Items List and Iteration Plan, or "list 1 and list 2" :-)
Cheers,
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM | RUP Team |
EPF Committer
Phone: 1 (408) 863-5019 (TL:
560-5019)
www.ibm.com
www.eclipse.org/epf
"Chris Armstrong"
<chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/12/2006 09:06 AM
|
Please respond
to
chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Please respond
to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "'Eclipse Process Framework Project
Developers List'" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [epf-dev] Next PM conf
call |
|
I'd like to schedule the next PM conference call for sometime this week.
As I'm pretty busy Wednesday and Thursday, I'd like to do it either tomorrow
(Tuesday) or Friday. Do others have any preference? I've also submitted many of
the items in the spreadsheet as Bugzilla entries, so one thing to do would be to
prioritize and assign those. There are still a small number that we need to
review or have been deferred because of their relationship to items to be
discussed. I suggest we start with that list first, see how it goes, and then
get to the submitted items. I've attached the updated spreadsheet and the
minutes from the last meeting.
Per, at the conference last week, we discussed if
you, as the project manager, could render our project management work products
using OpenUP templates (project plan and iteration plan). I'm thinking that each
discipline/package owner could being using our work item list template (once we
come up with one -- I'll try to take the lead on this for PM-related items).
What would be the best way for us to get going on this?
Thanks, Chris ~:|
<<...>> <<...>>
Chris Armstrong ~:|
President
Armstrong Process Group, Inc.
651.491.5575 c
715.246.0383 f
www.aprocessgroup.com
"proven
practical process" [attachment
"EPF_PM_SIG_MeetingNotes_20060602.doc" deleted by Ricardo
Balduino/Cupertino/IBM] [attachment "OpenUP_PM_ProcessElementList_20060611.xls"
deleted by Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/IBM] _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing
list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
