[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [epf-dev] PM conference call
|
Sounds appropriate.
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM | RUP Team | EPF Committer
Phone: 1 (408) 863-5019 (TL: 560-5019)
www.ibm.com
www.eclipse.org/epf
"Chris Armstrong"
<chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/22/2006 03:00 PM
|
Please respond to
chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "'Eclipse Process Framework Project
Developers List'" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [epf-dev] PM conference call |
|
Ricardo, just to make sure we're
all on the same page, I think we should talk about this a bit (like for
5-10 minutes at the most) during our Friday conference call. What does
everybody else think?
Chris ~:|
From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ricardo Balduino
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 12:36 PM
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] PM conference call
Bug #137120 relates to Work Items List.
My understanding from the Vancouver meeting (although I was not present,
I read the notes) is that we are having two separate artifacts, one for
a list of high level objectives (WIL) and the other for a list of assignable
tasks (Iteration Plan). Whether it is physically represented as one list
or two depends on project needs and will be expressed on the Representation
Options for the artifacts.
Naming is still open issue, as we have various combinations to choose from.
(I personally like Product Backlog/Iteration Plan OR Product Backlog/Iteration
Backlog)
If we still need to discuss structural changes related to this bug, we
need a conf call this week.
Cheers,
Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer
IBM | RUP Team | EPF Committer
"Chris Armstrong"
<chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/22/2006 09:42 AM
|
Please respond to
chris.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [epf-dev] PM conference call |
|
I'd like to arrange a conference call for the PM discipline in the next
couple of days, if possible. How does Wednesday work for everybody? Any
particular time better or worse for anybody? I'll prepare an agenda and
send something out shortly.
Brian, regarding bug #137120, what were you,
Mark, and Ricardo thinking of doing? I know I'd like to continue
be involved in this (from both of my perspectives as the PM discipline
lead and a content contributer), as I imagine others might (such as Bruce,
Jim, and Chris S) who have been a part of the dialogue the past number
of weeks. I'd also like to integrate this item with the other outstanding
items as it relates to the PM discipline.
Thanks, Chris ~:|
Chris Armstrong ~:|
President
Armstrong Process Group, Inc.
651.491.5575 c
715.246.0383 f
www.aprocessgroup.com
"proven practical process"
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
