hiho,
I vote yes.
-----------
b
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Per Kroll
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006
3:39 PM
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [epf-dev] VOTE: OpenUp
=> New name for BUP++
Hi,
we
have now (finally) got legal clearance on using the name OpenUp.
We
had informal voting a few months ago, and the results was anonnimously for
OpenUp.
To
get a formal voting record, I request that the committers respond to this
e-mail with a Yes, No, or Obstain vote regarding doing a name change.
Majority
vote rules.
Voters
are committers per the list at http://www.eclipse.org/epf/team/team.php
21
people listed under "Current Committers", "Voted to be committers"
+ DJ <We need to update the committer list to state that these 21 people are
committers> can vote, all votes are equal.
Proposal
to vote for:
-
OpenUp denotes the process framework built on top of BUP, including BUP.
-
OpenUp/BUP denotes what is today called Basic Unified Process (see
http://www.eclipse.org/epf/bup_component/bup_vision.php)
-
OpenUp/MDA denotes a potential future process in this framework guiding you in
how to develop software using an MDA approach
-
OpenUp/<X> denotes a potential future process in this framework guiding
you in how to develop software using an <X> approach
"Open"
in OpenUp signifies it's openess, as a result of being an open source process.
"Up"
signifies that it is the open source version of Unified Process
Lowercase
"p" signifies that OpenUp promotes process with a lowercase 'p',
rather than BIG P processes with a lot of overhead.
I
cast a YES vote through this e-mail.
Thanks
Per
Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
408-342-3815