[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [epf-dev] BUP Fundamental Concepts and Collaborative Principles Proposal
|
I'm in the "keep the UP phase names in BUP" camp.
I agree that there have been some problems with interpretation in the past and an improved introductory graphic that emphasises the iterative aspects of BUP is a great idea.
Equally, there is a large community of UP practitioners around the world who are familiar with the lifecycle model and it's (correct) usage. Furthermore, BUP is an implementation of UP and the phase names are an fundamental aspect of that.
I accept that it might be pretty lame to say "keep the phase names because they are what they are" but I'm not convinced that just changing them to something else will dramitically improve the situation.
regards
Mark
Whilst this email has been checked for all known viruses, recipients should undertake their own virus checking as Xansa will not accept any liability whatsoever.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and protected by client privilege. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient.
Please delete it and notify the sender if you have received it in
error. Unauthorised use is prohibited.
Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not
necessarily the organisation.
Xansa, Registered Office: 420 Thames Valley Park Drive,
Thames Valley Park, Reading, RG6 1PU, UK.
Registered in England No.1000954.
t +44 (0)8702 416181
w www.xansa.com
