Hi Wayne,
Once in a while I get a warning message to set a release date
for the Texo project. So in the past I set it to a future date,
and this was 1st dec 2013.
The idea is to first get some traction. The past year the number
of users and the messages on the forum have increased
significantly. The 0.1 version number is a bit too modest. Texo
is being used already by several projects/users for a while, it
has a stable build with hunderds of tests being run.
I recently pinged Ed
(Merks) on a graduation/release review for Texo. It is my plan
to start the graduation process shortly and then try a release
q1 next year.
In any case sorry for the inconvenience, I deleted the
release date.
With Regards, Martin Taal
Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mtaal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - mtaal@xxxxxxxxx
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org
On 12/03/2013 08:41 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
The Texo project is showing a 1.0.0 release [1] on Dec. 1.
AFAICT this is bogus.
Can somebody from the Texo project team please either correct my
assessment, update the release record, or remove it (you'll have
to send a note to emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
to request the removal; changing is better).
AFAICT, Texo is active and seems to be following the rules, other
than the yearly review requirement. The downloads area has
"interim" 0.1 builds which makes me think that the 1.0 release in
the metadata is a little premature. It is strongly recommended
that the project engage in an incubation release before engaging
in a graduation review.
AFAICT, the project predates the requirement for mentors. Does the
project require a mentor?
Thanks,
Wayne
[1]
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emft.texo/releases/1.0.0
_______________________________________________
emft-dev mailing list
emft-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emft-dev
|