Dave Steinberg schrieb:
Hi again,
I'm still waiting for word from Net4j/CDO. Our options are only a
single log for the whole project or one log from each component. If I
don't hear anything more, I guess we'll just go with the latter option.
Sorry, I did not realize that my feedback was needed ;-(
We have only two _very_ small contributions that do not come from
committers:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Modeling&product=EMF&component=CDO&component=Net4j&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_w
hiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=iplog%2B
The iplog+ flag is set properly for these so I thought I was safe. I'm
fine with whatever the rest of us decides since this way or that wayit
won't cause me much effort ;-)
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
Cheers,
Dave
--
Dave Steinberg
Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab
mailto:davidms@xxxxxxxxxx
 Dave
Steinberg---05/29/2009 11:35:42 AM---Hi all,
From: |
Dave Steinberg/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA |
To: |
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: |
05/29/2009 11:35 AM |
Subject: |
[emf-dev] EMF IP Logs |
Hi all,
I've exchanged email with a number of people individually about IP
Logs, but I just wanted to touch base with the the whole list.
The automated IP Log for all of EMF is here: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log.php?projectid=modeling.emf
To the best of my understanding, it seems that it still doesn't support
doing components separately, so one person would need to submit the
results for the whole project. I think that's a problem for us. I also
know that, for Core at least, it would take considerable Bugzilla
tweaking to get a more or less correct result. I know that at least
Core, Query, Transaction, Validation, and Teneo have done old-school
static logs manually already. So, I think we should just stick with
that approach for this release.
I've updated the log for Core in CVS
(modeling/emf/emf/eclipse-project-ip-log.csv). I've also folded all
those changes into the main log for EMF
(modeling/emf/eclipse-project-ip-log.csv). I can see that Query,
Transaction, and Validation are up to date in that combined log, too.
I'm happy either to submit our logs independently from our components,
or to submit a single log once everyone has included their
contributions. Could people please voice their preferences?
Cheers,
Dave
--
Dave Steinberg
Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab
mailto:davidms@xxxxxxxxxx_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
|
