| Hi, Dave,
Thanks for setting my confusion straight. According to the sched, Platform has already passed the +0 mark, so should have published its release build ID and URLs.
I never know any more how this stuff is supposed to work. Your plan sounds as reasonable to me as any other! ;-)
cW
On 17-Feb-09, at 3:55 PM, Dave Steinberg wrote: Hi Christian,
I did that build today to pick up one last fix for EMF 2.4.2:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=264771
Barring any catastrophic discoveries, that build should become our release. My intention was to do the rename when Eclipse does it (or at least finalizes that M20090211-1700 will be the build that gets renamed).
Or do we not bother with that stuff anymore, and just let our release build point at a non-release dependency?
Cheers,
Dave
--
Dave Steinberg
Rational Software - IBM Toronto Lab
mailto:davidms@xxxxxxxxxx
<graycol.gif>"Christian W. Damus" ---02/17/2009 03:42:15 PM---Hi,
<ecblank.gif>
From: | <ecblank.gif>
"Christian W. Damus" <give.a.damus@xxxxxxxxx> | <ecblank.gif>
To: | <ecblank.gif>
Eclipse Modelling Framework <emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> | <ecblank.gif>
Date: | <ecblank.gif>
02/17/2009 03:42 PM | <ecblank.gif>
Subject: | <ecblank.gif>
[emf-dev] EMF 2.4.2 R-build? |
Hi,
I just got the build feed announcing EMF 2.4.2RC2, an S-build. Is
there an R-build coming soon? Because today's the day!
Cheers,
Christian
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
|
