Nick,
I am also in favour of having the EMF builds run somewhere outside a company network. Makes it way more accessible and transparent :-)
Peter On 13.10.2008, at 19:25, Anthony Hunter wrote: Hi Nick, Now that we have a number of non-IBM committers on these projects, it does not make sense to run the builds on internal IBM build machine. Same for all of the projects. Cheers... Anthony -- Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools Phone: 613-270-4613 <graycol.gif>Nick Boldt---10/12/2008 12:10:47 PM---I notice while I was on vacation last week that the EMF N builds ran (I got email notifications), b <ecblank.gif> From: | <ecblank.gif> Nick Boldt/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA | <ecblank.gif> To: | <ecblank.gif> emf-dev <emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> | <ecblank.gif> Date: | <ecblank.gif> 10/12/2008 12:10 PM | <ecblank.gif> Subject: | <ecblank.gif> [emf-dev] Move EMF build to emft.eclipse.org? | I notice while I was on vacation last week that the EMF N builds ran (I got email notifications), but the I build did not. As I no longer have VPN access to emf.torolab.ibm.com, should we move the EMF build to emft.eclipse.org (or better, modeling.eclipse.org) so that it can be run outside IBM? (I'd expected to have time this coming week to do such a migration, but with my VPN access being shut off 2 weeks earlier than expected, it's a tad more difficult.) I suppose the same question might be asked for UML2, JET, and GEF... Thoughts? -- Nick Boldt :: http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/User:Nickb _______________________________________________ emf-dev mailing list emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev _______________________________________________ emf-dev mailing list emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
|