Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[emf-dev] Re: [m2m-dev] What is a Mini-Deck? :: Action Required (re: Ganymede Release Review Slides)

Well, I already did the GMF slides.  How about the last project to complete
theirs can combine the rest into a single set for all of Modeling? ;)  Go!

I think a single set for Modeling would be best.  Last year we reviewed each
at the PMC.  I suppose we can all send them to the PMC mailing list, then we
can combine them easily enough.

Thanks,
Rich


On 5/16/08 11:59 AM, "Nick Boldt" <codeslave@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Guys:
> 
> I spoke with Bjorn moments ago, and here's what we need to do to
> condense the Ganymede Release Review Slide Deck into a Mini-Deck:
> 
> (2008-05-16 11:34:43) Nick: is there a document describing what needs to
> be in a "mini-deck" vs. a "release review slide deck?"
> 
> (2008-05-16 11:35:12) Bjorn: Mini-deck: one or two (or three slides)
> highlight how great your project is
> (2008-05-16 11:35:43) Bjorn: The idea is that with 30 projects, we'll
> make one "summary of the release" deck with 1 or 2 slides per project.
> Not "archive quality" but more advertisement.
> 
> (2008-05-16 11:36:13) Nick: like, 3 bullets per slide, max 6-9 bullets
> for each of the Modeling projects?
> 
> (2008-05-16 11:37:23) Bjorn: Format: look at the "one minute slides"
> from last year: 
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/slides/EuropaReleaseReview_06June2007.zip
> 
> (2008-05-16 11:37:50) Nick: are we treating Modeling as one project or
> as 6 (EMF, EMFT, M2M, M2T, MDT, GMF) ?
> 
> (2008-05-16 11:38:21) Bjorn: One or Many: for the mini deck it's your
> choice: for the big decks, they are separate projects.
> 
> (2008-05-16 11:56:55) Nick: are these minideck slides to be attached to
> the decks submitted on June 4? or should they be held separately?
> 
> (2008-05-16 11:57:08) Bjorn: one file is fine, two files is also fine
> 
> (2008-05-16 11:57:56) Nick: and if merged, would the minideck +
> "supporting slides / appendix" idea work, in that all the longer stuff
> would just be at the back in case people actually read that far?
> 
> (2008-05-16 11:58:09) Bjorn: exactly
> 
> ---------
> 
> So we have the choice of either 1-2 (or three) slides for all of
> Modeling in Ganymede (6 projects combined) or one set of 1-2 slides for
> each project in Modeling in Ganymede (2-12 slides total).
> 
> Project Leads: which, um, *model*, do people prefer?
> 
> N
> _______________________________________________
> m2m-dev mailing list
> m2m-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2m-dev



Back to the top